Scripts: The example of the work with the CSV file as with a table - page 3

New comment
 
Yedelkin:
Do you know how to read code or what?

Yedelkin, don't be mad. I corrected string nCol to int .

Fortunately, the compiler in my head is not from MQL5. :))

 
sergeev: Yedelkin, don't be pissed off. I've corrected string nCol to int .

"Piss off" is your fate, Sergeyev. It was originally:

input string nCol=4; // Number of columns in the file

void OnStart()
{
  ....ArrayResize(column, nCol); 
  for (int i=0; i<nCol; i++) // read the first line
  {
 

I'm telling you, you noticed, good for you. Take a pie off the shelf.

:)

 
TheXpert: You have no idea. This is a common mistake because the code was written directly in the browser, not in ME. And by the way, it doesn't affect performance.
So you can't read code. Can't even read what's highlighted. It's highlighted as "full of crap for publishing in Codebase".
 
TheXpert:

You have no idea.

This is a common mistake because the code was written directly in the browser, not in ME. And by the way, it doesn't affect performance.

No, no, no. It's a matter of principle. Like I'm gonna catch you in the act and I'm gonna kill you. :)

This example is not for you, my dear MQL5 colleagues (I respect you too, Yedelkin, don't be offended by our arguments on concepts. it always happens),

but for Denis M. Lazarev personally.

---------------------

but that was not even the topic of my message from the beginning.

I am afraid that at this rate and the attitude of admins codebase five will go very far.

 
sergeev: at this rate and the attitude of the admins, codebase five will go a long way.
That's kind of what I'm saying, too. Except without going directly to Automated-Trading.
 
Fellas. Forget about the subject. It's nothing.
 

Okay. Well, don't bother me. I'll read it in the morning,

and I'll do my due diligence, and I'll punish whoever's responsible. :) good night.

 
TheXpert: This is not the author's code ) it is just a more or less tweaked version of Sergeyev as an alternative )) . The highlighted (in bold) was not in the original post. So what's the peep? Come on rivers, reader.
Are you saying that I, not being able to see the original code, bought the G-code (tweaked) from Sergeyev? In this case I will have nothing to object to and will have to apologise to you for the unreasonableness of my statement.
 
Yedelkin:
The fight didn't happen :) well that's fine. Accepted.
1234
New comment