Discussion of article "Application of the Eigen-Coordinates Method to Structural Analysis of Nonextensive Statistical Distributions" - page 4

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
MetaQuotes,
Can you translate the discusions of the article in Russian to English, because there are some practical applications.Google translator is no good.
Let us consider the practical application of eigen-coordinates method to classical example of SP500 daily returns: (see Nonextensive Entropy: Interdisciplinary Applications)
We have used the daily data from: http://wikiposit.org/w?filter=Finance/Futures/Indices/S__and__P%20500/
To see how to perform the analysis in your terminal, the file SP500-data.csv must be placed to \Files\ folder.
After that you need to launch two scripts:
1) CalcDistr_SP500.mq5 (it calculates the distribution).
2) q-gaussian-SP500.mq5 (eigen-coordinates analysis)
The results are:
The estimated value of q, derived by eigen-coordinates method (q=1+1/theta): q~1,55
The value, reported in the book (Fig.4 of the article) q~1.4.
Now let's check does q-gaussian look like the native function:
Conclusions: Generally, one can see that these data can be described by q-gaussian function. It explains the successful interpretation using q-gaussian, reported in the book.
The raw ("as is") data are used, but don't forget that we deal with the "smoothed" data (indirect averaging, because the index consist of many stocks + daily data).
X1 and X2 are very sensible because of their structure, also we have the deformed tails on X3 and X4, but anyway the q-gaussian looks very close to the "native" function of the SP500 daily data returns distribution.
The shape of the X1 and X2 can be improved (linearlized) by using the integrated values (the integral form like JX1 and JX2 will lead to the straight lines). The tails on X3 and X4 can be improved if we generalize the formula: (x-x0)^2 --> (x^2+bx+c) (but it leads to the new parameters) Similarly, the cubic case (1+a(x-x0)^3)^theta and its generalization can be considered.
Is the q-gaussian native for all financial instruments? It's necessary to consider the instrument/timeframe dependence.