модель должна учиться как человек — не заменять старые знания новыми, а дополнять их. Когда опытный трейдер видит новый паттерн, он не забывает старые — он добавляет новый в свой арсенал и начинает понимать, в каких условиях какой паттерн работает.
Discussions are beginning to emerge online about the dawn of the post-transformer era (Baby Dragon Hatchling) – networks with an order of magnitude fewer parameters (with ‘embryonic’ knowledge), which then undergo continuous further training whilst working directly with new data and retain context indefinitely, in accordance with Hebb’s rule, and with the ability to visually visualise the process behind each decision.
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Check out the new article: Implementing a Continuous LLM Adaptation System for Algorithmic Trading.
When I first started using Llama 3.2 to predict currency pairs, the process looked elegant: collect three months of historical data, fine-tune the model on 2,000 examples, and get excellent results. Two weeks later, the model starts to fail. Not catastrophically—it’s just that confidence drops, accuracy slides toward random chance, and the most unpleasant part is that the model remains confident in its predictions even though they no longer work.
The classic solution is to retrain the model on fresh data. It sounds logical—until you start doing the math. Fine-tuning Llama 3.2:3B on 2,000 examples takes about 40 minutes on an RTX 3090. If we do this every week, we end up with 160 minutes of pure downtime per month. Add data preparation, validation, and testing to that, and it comes out to half a day’s work. And that's assuming we even managed to notice the model's degradation before it led to significant losses.
But the main problem isn't time. The main problem is that when the model is retrained, it forgets old patterns. The market is cyclical: what hasn't worked over the past two weeks may come back in a month. Standard fine-tuning follows an overwriting principle: new knowledge pushes out the old. We end up with a model that works very well in the current market regime but is completely ineffective when a regime change occurs.
Author: Yevgeniy Koshtenko