site:mql5.com Get in touch with developers using Service Desk

New comment
 
Sharing my recent experience with Service Desk for the record.

In May 2026 my product was removed from the Market for 
"similarities to another product." I filed three separate 
Service Desk tickets:

Ticket 1: Submitted technical evidence (original code, unique 
features, different architecture). Closed without review of 
the evidence.

Ticket 2: Resubmitted the appeal with parameter-by-parameter 
comparison showing the differences between my product and the 
one I was accused of copying. Reply addressed only the 
description, not the code. I offered to rewrite the description 
fully. Offer ignored.

Ticket 3: Requested arbitration after I observed that the same 
Support Team, eight days later, defended a different product 
against a nearly identical plagiarism claim using the opposite 
criteria — stating that "common input names and a few same 
values are not enough to remove a product for plagiarism."

I asked the Support Team a direct question: if that standard 
applies, why was my product removed for the same kind of 
overlap? The ticket was closed without answering.

My question to this thread is procedural, not about any 
specific product:

Is there a formal escalation path when a Service Desk ticket 
is closed without addressing a direct logical contradiction in 
the Support Team's own replies, within the same week?

I have offered to rewrite my description fully under any 
guideline. I am only asking for one consistent standard 
applied to all sellers.
New comment