Reconsider the Signals algorithm that hides a signal after a few days of no trading. - page 2

 
Michael Charles Schefe #:

what is age of the signal page? i am sure that is biggest factor in reliability rating.

Also there has been a few threads mentioning that when profit is over 50% a month, then, this month is ignored by the ratings calculation. maybe you did a month like this?

with inital deposit of $10 i am surprised that your signal service is displayed at all. imo all looks good to me, just keep doing what you doing and rating will improve.

But also -- with sub cost of $30, then, i doubt a subscriber would make enuf to cover the cost of subscription each month. even so, imo keep doing what you doing and your rating will improve as your account grows up(gets older).

A profitable live signal is a major trust builder subscriber earnings aside. I am old in the site but not so informed on the signals here but I think the subscriber should be able to set a bigger lot size than the signal. I mean I can open 0.01 but on the subscriber end they should be able to have it translated to say 0.1 if they have a bigger account.

 
Tonny Obare #:

A profitable live signal is a major trust builder subscriber earnings aside. I am old in the site but not so informed on the signals here but I think the subscriber should be able to set a bigger lot size than the signal. I mean I can open 0.01 but on the subscriber end they should be able to have it translated to say 0.1 if they have a bigger account.

agreed that that is how it should be.