Reconsider the Signals algorithm that hides a signal after a few days of no trading. - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
what is age of the signal page? i am sure that is biggest factor in reliability rating.
Also there has been a few threads mentioning that when profit is over 50% a month, then, this month is ignored by the ratings calculation. maybe you did a month like this?
with inital deposit of $10 i am surprised that your signal service is displayed at all. imo all looks good to me, just keep doing what you doing and rating will improve.
But also -- with sub cost of $30, then, i doubt a subscriber would make enuf to cover the cost of subscription each month. even so, imo keep doing what you doing and your rating will improve as your account grows up(gets older).A profitable live signal is a major trust builder subscriber earnings aside. I am old in the site but not so informed on the signals here but I think the subscriber should be able to set a bigger lot size than the signal. I mean I can open 0.01 but on the subscriber end they should be able to have it translated to say 0.1 if they have a bigger account.
A profitable live signal is a major trust builder subscriber earnings aside. I am old in the site but not so informed on the signals here but I think the subscriber should be able to set a bigger lot size than the signal. I mean I can open 0.01 but on the subscriber end they should be able to have it translated to say 0.1 if they have a bigger account.
Very annoying as it forces someone to make unnecessary random scalping trades just to stay visible.
A profitable live signal is a major trust builder subscriber earnings aside. I am old in the site but not so informed on the signals here but I think the subscriber should be able to set a bigger lot size than the signal. I mean I can open 0.01 but on the subscriber end they should be able to have it translated to say 0.1 if they have a bigger account.
Put your money where your mouth is. Why should anyone risk real money when you can blow an account worth pennies. Sure there are enough dumb sheeple here but speaking in common sense and logic, why?
All you do is complain without taking into account the other side, the subscriber.
Why would a subscriber pay 30 bucks a month when there is a chance no trade is taken at all, or you have to manage the trade yourself after you did not prolong the subscritption for the fact that you can not cover the damn signal fee?
You deposit and withraw almost more times then trade. Do you expect your subscriber to ACTIVELY montor your signal the whole day in order to make up for the change in risk?
Delusional.
Put your money where your mouth is. Why should anyone risk real money when you can blow an account worth pennies. Sure there are enough dumb sheeple here but speaking in common sense and logic, why?
All you do is complain without taking into account the other side, the subscriber.
Why would a subscriber pay 30 bucks a month when there is a chance no trade is taken at all, or you have to manage the trade yourself after you did not prolong the subscritption for the fact that you can not cover the damn signal fee?
You deposit and withraw almost more times then trade. Do you expect your subscriber to ACTIVELY montor your signal the whole day in order to make up for the change in risk?
Delusional.