been testing different systems recently, and something keeps standing out. Most EAs aren’t necessarily bad at finding trade signals, they’re just not very good at avoiding bad conditions.
You’ll see things like:
- indicators align open trade
- conditions met open trade
But markets don’t really reward activity if anything, they punish it. I wondered
What if the problem isn’t signal detection…but the lack of restraint?
Instead of trying to make systems better at finding trades,
what if they were designed to be better at refusing them?
Not just filtering after the fact,
but being inherently biased toward not trading unless everything makes sense structurally.
I’m curious how others approach this. Do you think most EAs suffer more from overtrading…
or from poor signal quality?
You seem to describe the difference between "Gambler" EA and "Casino" EA.
What are you aiming to achieve? Attract attention to your product?
You seem to describe the difference between "Gambler" EA and "Casino" EA.
What are you aiming to achieve? Attract attention to your product?
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
been testing different systems recently, and something keeps standing out. Most EAs aren’t necessarily bad at finding trade signals, they’re just not very good at avoiding bad conditions.
You’ll see things like:
But markets don’t really reward activity if anything, they punish it. I wondered
What if the problem isn’t signal detection…but the lack of restraint?
Instead of trying to make systems better at finding trades,
what if they were designed to be better at refusing them?
Not just filtering after the fact,
but being inherently biased toward not trading unless everything makes sense structurally.
I’m curious how others approach this. Do you think most EAs suffer more from overtrading…
or from poor signal quality?