Question about market rules against prohibited terms in product title. - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's possible that the more recent issue isn't that the product claims to use AI, but rather that the title includes a specific third party AI such as 'OpenAI'. It could be a concern over trademark or maybe it's problematic to imply that the product is affiliated with OpenAI or some other service.
I have no idea about this (most recent) issue sorry ...
---------------------
But the products were removed from the Market several/many months ago just because of the following ("machine translation" to the English):
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing of trading strategies
There is no place to turn with advisors' problems
Rashid Umarov , 2023.07.25 08:28
A person posted 4 junk products under the word GPT and did not build a connection?
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing of trading strategies
There is no place to turn with advisors' problems
Rashid Umarov , 2023.07.25 10:35
Programs are not removed from the Market just like that. I already gave you a tip, we fight hype and garbage products.
-------------------------
But if the admins removed some products and the seller does not agree with that (thr seller: "can you please explain what GPT is and where exactly I used it?")
so the admins ask this seller to write to the service desk (to technically explain about the "connection" between his product and GPT for example):
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing of trading strategies
There is no place to turn with advisors' problems
Rashid Umarov , 2023.07.25 09:27
...Write to Service Desk with links to products, they will sort it out.
------------------
It is all the information I found on the forum (it is related to the discussion which was many months ago on the forum).
Rule 6 under Part IV seems like it's about overriding the built in Mql5 licensing system with your own private licensing server. I doubt this applies to all WebRequests, since News Filter is a very common feature for EA's and these use WebRequests. I think the potential issue is not that WebRequests are used, but that the WebRequests are being sent to OpenAI or DeepSeek. I previously assumed it was okay and acceptable, but the recent product name changes I mentioned earlier made me nervous about it and I don't know if its a violation to have a product that's using or mentioning OpenAI/DeepSeek and to what extent is allowed.
It looks like WebRequest is indeed allowed. Below is a screenshot from the description of a random market product (they ask to allow WebRequest to their site):
At first glance, creating a market product that communicates with chatgpt (or a similar service) looks technically feasible. But this is not certain.😁 I have never sold anything on the market and have never used the API of AI services.
I wonder if the same will ever happen with product logos😁
If the product actually communicates with AI, then those logos seem fair.