Discussing the article: "OpenAI's ChatGPT features within the framework of MQL4 and MQL5 development" - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is the task of the EMA writer - to make all his subsequent calculations equal to the previous ones. It is not necessary to save up bars until you are blue in the face, but, as I wrote above, you only need 10-20 times more bars than the period.
About cycles is very convincing... Of course, there is absolutely no difference between a cycle of 10 bars and a cycle of 100 bars... Especially if you consider the existence of fast algorithms for calculating averages.
10 to 20 times? Why not 50 to 100? Or maybe 100-1000 ? How do you measure that? I understand what you're saying, but I'm not even interested in wasting my time arguing about it
SymbolInfoDouble(_Symbol,SYMBOL_POINT) - this is how it should be. In general, you have understood... I'm the one who fixed most of the errors. I would have seen it all if it was the code for my ts. There are flaws... and if you don't know what you're doing, it's useless. You're on the right track. He's often wrong. There's a reason I wrote that article. I could make a super prompt, it would not make a mistake and give everything perfectly, but it would be useless because it's all a show. In real field conditions we ask simple human questions, which in the best case can be more specific, but as practice shows not much it reduces post processing.
No, just smiled)))) with fantasy error) and in this case for the current symbol you can just _Point).
Well yes, I appreciated the joke ))). But God forbid you start making a multitool ))))
10, 20 times? Why not 50 to 100? How about 100 to 1,000? How do you quantify that? I understand what you're saying, but I'm not even interested in wasting my time arguing about it
With your brain, mate, with your brain. I.e. it is necessary from the presence, first of all... and there, and then, and then, and interest will appear.
Use your brains, mate, use your brains. I.e. it is necessary to be available, first of all... and there, and then, you will see, and interest will appear.
You must be a very sensitive person. Perhaps I was wrong to make an emotional comment.
Check out the new article: OpenAI's ChatGPT features within the framework of MQL4 and MQL5 development.
Author: Evgeniy Ilin
Thank you very much Evgeniy Ilin
This article perfectly outlines how to effectively use the AI technology in programming while also pointing out what to avoid.
I am the same as you, after using ChatGPT I have much more positive thoughts about it because it is very smart and fast.
"apply a technology for its intended purpose reduces both the cost of any development and labor costs"
This is also my objective
Certainly! Here's an example of a MetaTrader 5 Expert Advisor (EA) based on Bollinger Bands. This EA buys when the price crosses below the lower Bollinger Band and sells when the price crosses above the upper Bollinger Band: