Nikolai Semko: The truth is that the secondary problem is not solved by this primary one. And automation for the sake of automation, if it does not ultimately result in a profitable strategy, is absurd.
The Grail is not sought in this thread, and therefore the profitability of the TS created is secondary. The main thing is that the TS should be based on a professional understanding of the market.
The Grail is not sought in this thread, and therefore the profitability of the TS created is secondary. The main thing is that the TS should be based on a professional understanding of the market.
You have repeatedly stated that you do not trade. Where will you get a professional understanding of the market? You don't have a professional understanding of the market. And you won't until youtrade the market professionally.
Aleksei Stepanenko: Yes, but the main difference between a trend and a flat is that a trend updates its extremes after a while, while a flat does not. Do you agree?
Not exactly. A flat also updates its extrema. It's just that the difference between the two is much smaller than that of a trend.
using only the 3rd indicator and the first two to be trashed.
The truth is that the secondary problem is not solved by this primary one. And automation for the sake of automation, if it does not ultimately result in a profitable strategy, is absurd.
As I understand it, one of the first tasks now is to separate the trend from the flat. Right?
As I understand it, one of the first tasks now is to separate the trend from the flat. Right?
We need to work out the criteria. Any ideas?
You have repeatedly stated that you do not trade. Where will you get a professional understanding of the market? You don't have a professional understanding of the market. And you won't until youtrade the market professionally.
Yes.
Yes, but the main difference between a trend and a flat is that a trend updates its extremes after a while, while a flat does not. Do you agree?