My approach. The core is the engine. - page 162
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The deadlock of mass integration with C# is evident in basic logical reasoning:
1. Suppose they created a universal connection to Sharp and everyone liked the new features. Wiz.studio, Windows GUI and all that... Everybody reached for C# and started to use it.
2. Trust in DLL EAs has grown. People freely put hybrid robots in trading. Helping each other to write them. Passing codes...
There are scammers, who see increased public trust to DLL EAs and decide to use it for stealing personal information, spreading viruses and other scams. They write malicious code, put it in the Expert Advisors, and throw them in the public domain. Advertise them as profitable Expert Advisors.
4. There appear victims - nuns, uninformed, altruists ... They write on the forum, telling. Confidence in the Expert Advisors written by others (even honest ones) begins to decline. Suspicions arise. Paranoia.
5. The circle closes. The wave of increased interest is inevitably killed by perpetrators taking advantage of other people's trust. And since there is no DLL control system, any mass use of MT-Sharp hybrids, turns into a roulette game.
But they are bound to proliferate, and there is no way to stop it. At this stage, the direction leads to a deadlock: - harm to advisors' reputation grows and a negative background is drawn around MT5, which supports malicious programming that hurts someone.
Therefore, this direction will not lead to anything good.
The error in your reasoning is that you think that there is a mass demand for GUIs for Expert Advisors. But there isn't.
And if there is mass demand, the terminal developers will take care of it.
The error in your reasoning is that you think there is a massive need for GUIs for EAs. But there isn't.
It's not just about GUIs. Linking to .Net can even be used for paralleling calculations. Linking to databases, matlab and the like. It all looks like bait for nerds who will believe the scammers that their DLL is meant to enhance the robot's capabilities and other blah blah blah...
It's dangerous to create a new mod. Massiveness can bring good as well as evil.It's about nubs, and they don't understand these nuances and don't understand the codes....
Peter, it's not a technology problem. There are trusted sources and there are not. You don't download any apk files for your Android, you go to google store and install the same apk there, but you consider them trustworthy.
You don't have to be smart not to run crap on your computer. This is a matter of common sense and only. And pure ex5 + WebRequest can steal so much information from the user that sometimes it gets scary. So don't exaggerate the problem.
It's not just about the GUI. Linking to .Net can even be used to parallelise calculations. Linking to databases, matlab and so on. All this looks like bait for the nerds, who will believe the scammers that their DLL is meant to enhance the robot's capabilities and other blah blah blah...
Whoever orders gets the open source code and compiles it themselves.
Peter, this is not a technology problem. There are trusted sources and there are not. You don't download any apk files for your Android, you go to google store and install the same apk there, but consider it trustworthy.
You don't have to be smart not to run crap on your computer. This is a matter of common sense and only. And pure ex5 + WebRequest can steal so much information from the user that sometimes it gets scary. So don't exaggerate the problem.
Before one understands what is trash and what is not, one gets burned first. It is inevitable. We can create conditions in which many gullible people will get burned on EAs, which will be advertised by scammers as profitable TSs and spread on the wave of our hybrids advertising here in articles and code support. The scammers will take advantage of the trust that we ourselves will create.
Everyone knows that the DLL cannot be distributed in the Market, but it can be bypassed. And suddenly MT5 is increasing support for DLL communication, i.e. -tacitly supporting a way around the Market.
Before one realises what is trash and what is not, one gets burned first. It is inevitable. We can create an environment in which many gullible people will get burned by EAs, which will be advertised by scammers under the guise of profitable TSs and spread on the wave of our hybrid advertising here in articles and code support. The scammers will take advantage of the trust that we ourselves will create.
Everyone knows that the DLL cannot be distributed in the Market, but it can be bypassed. And suddenly MT5 reinforces support for DLL communication, that is -tacitly supports a way around the Market.
Peter, you don't need any dll for an EA to drain a bunch of trusted user's money. Right now a bunch of Market EAs are leaking dlls to users who bought them completely officially.
All right. The topic is over. Vasily, I'm not going to discourage you from writing an article.
Just keep in mind that the masses arise unplanned and spontaneously, and their results can be unpredictable and unpleasant.
Peter, you don't need any dll for an EA to leak a bunch of money to a gullible user. There are a lot of Market Expert Advisors now leaking dlls to users who have bought them completely officially.
We are talking about malicious programs, which can be carried by Expert Advisors. That is, they will not only leak, but also corrupt the operating system and steal personal information.)
If MQ has ill-wishers, they can exploit this loophole. They will distribute blatantly malicious software to undermine the reputation of algotrading.
One last thing. The new niche of hybrids, which you Vasily may create out of good intentions (which you know where they lead), will crush the niche of Market utilities outright. Against the backdrop of Sharp's apps, the utilities there will simply be flushed down the toilet. It's a shame about the authors. They did their best.
Read as: "Shame about me, I tried so hard. P.K."
You just saw a threat, simple, easy, quick and affordable, to your years of effort - all your hard work will just be flushed down the toilet.
But the authors you're fighting for, if they see that their tools become less popular, they will easily create them compatible with C#, or just quickly make new ones. And that is exactly the threat. But not to society and the marketplace, but to you. After all, it's easy to read it in your veiled "concern for the people"