You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Have you watched both images in their original 1280*720 sizes ?
However, I'm not sure anyone buys a product sitting in a café looking at pictures on a smartphone - well, not morons...
I'm afraid there are more such "morons" than "normals" these days. Mobile traffic overtook desktop traffic back in 2016.
Yes, lines can be seen clearly, colours can be seen clearly, I don't see a problem at all.
Perhaps we have different quality requirements, but I will take into account that for some (and maybe most!?) this is an acceptable result - maybe I shouldn't bother.
I still don't understand what all the codec stuff is for... YouTube quality is enough for the vast majority of people...
Perhaps we have different quality requirements, but I'll take into account that for some (and maybe most!?) this is an acceptable result - maybe I shouldn't bother.
So no problem at all, I'm looking at 27" and everything is great.
I'm afraid there are more such "morons" than "normals" now. Mobile traffic overtook desktop traffic back in 2016.
I still don't understand why all these codec tricks are necessary... The YouTube quality is quite enough for the vast majority of people...
You still need to upload it to YouTube, already encoded, and it's important not to lose quality in doing so, and for that you need to find the right codec - I've discarded a whole bunch of them.
So there's no problem at all, I'm looking at 27" and everything's great.
And you don't see any difference in quality between colour and DH, seriously?
And you can't tell the difference in quality between colour and CB, can you?
Not DH, but CHB, of course :)
And you can't tell the difference in quality between colour and DH, can you?
Neither do I. And do you unfold to full screen and turn on HD, or do you look in the window?