What is a trend? - page 32

 

The shoreline paradox

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%81_%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8
Парадокс береговой линии — Википедия
Парадокс береговой линии — Википедия
  • ru.wikipedia.org
Пример парадокса: если береговая линия Великобритании измеряется отрезками по 100 км, то её длина составляет примерно 2 800 км. Если используются отрезки по 50 км, то длина равна приблизительно 3 400 км, что на 600 км больше. Парадокс береговой линии — противоречивое наблюдение в географических науках, связанное с невозможностью точно...
 
Andrew Petras:

From a technical point of view, looking through a magnifying glass at a piece of asphalt can make us think that we are looking at a road.

In fact, what we see there won't even interest a cyclist.

Trends on ticks, n-minutes, hours are pseudo-scientific fiction.


For you, I take it, trends from daily or weekly charts. It's good. For me, so the trends are smaller.

If those who don't understand what a trend is, it does not exist for them.

Many people in this thread have spoken specifically.

 
Andrew Petras:

From a technical point of view, looking through a magnifying glass at a piece of asphalt can make us think that we are looking at a road.

In fact, what we see there won't even interest a cyclist.

Trends on ticks, n-minutes, clocks are pseudo-scientific fiction.

About the magnifying glass is very interesting. You're probably right. Actually it crosses out the fractality of the wave structure of market price movement:

http://ignat.news/post/wave-trend/

But I'm all for doubting and trying to refute authority figures.

Фрактальные связи, SK-FX
  • skfx.xp3.biz
Система SK-FX Фрактальные связи (термин мой)       Тяжелее всего сделать простое интересным. Предисловие. Материал статьи является фундаментом построения точной торговой системы SK-FX. Свойства волновой рыночной структуры. Волновая структура рынка представляет собой вложенные самоподобные волновые подструктуры разных уровней (фрактальность...
 
Uladzimir Izerski:

For you, I understand the trends are from daily or weekly charts. Okay. For me, trends are smaller than that.

If someone does not understand what a trend is, it does not exist for them at all.

There are many people in this thread who have spoken specifically.

И? What kind of specifics comes out of your post? Do you understand what is good?

 
Yury Kirillov:

The shoreline paradox

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%81_%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8

Completely far-fetched, it must be said. Solved for millennia by the water table.

 
Andrew Petras:

Completely far-fetched, I must say. Solved millennia ago by the water level.


??? How's that? Mathematicians don't know! Let them know immediately.

Maybe nested trends by some level have been solved for millennia too?

 
Yury Kirillov:

??? How's that? Mathematicians don't know! Let them know immediately.

Maybe the nested trends have been solved for millennia too?

In the hundreds.

ps partially voiced by Dow.
 
Andrew Petras:

И? What specifics follow from your post? Do you understand what is good?


It's good that you can see at least on bigger TFs.

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

It's good that you can see at least on bigger TFs.

What's not good?

 
Andrew Petras:

What's wrong with that?


So that's great!!!

Others don't see these either.(((

Reason: