Sparring on MetaQuotes-Demo demo accounts - page 129
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
http://mvs.hol.es/Monitoring/
The penultimate day seems likely - despite the heavy losses, Igor will come first.
The second nomination, Sergey Don, seems to leave no chance for the other participants to win, coming out on the last finishing lap of the race with the result 2.092 points
We have a question for the participants - do you think it is worth adding a deposit load to the evaluation of the formula?
As far as the second category is risk-free trading - it would be fair.
In this case our friend Ziheng from China would be on the 1st place in the second nomination and Andrey Sharov on the 2nd one.
http://mvs.hol.es/Monitoring/
The penultimate day seems very likely - despite the big losses, Igor will come first.
If I were Igor, I would stop the robot. In that case, there would be a better chance of winning, considering the monstrous loss of what has already been earned. It would be very difficult for the rest of the competitors to reach him.
Although, Igor should be afraid of, hmm... me. I have made several last deals manually using the new indicator, which managed to rise up the leaderboard in only 3 hours. If I manage to make the Expert Advisor, it will trade today and tomorrow. I am just saying, Igor, do not relax! ))
The second nomination, Sergey Don, seems to leave no chance for the other participants to win, coming out on the last finishing lap of the race with the result 2.092 points
We have a question for the participants, do you think it is worth adding a deposit load to the evaluation of the formula?
Since the second nomination is trading without risk - it would probably be fair.
In that case, our friend from China Ziheng would be on the 1st place in the second nomination, and Andrey Sharov on the 2nd.
Well firstly, the second nomination assesses the effectiveness of the strategy: a complex evaluation of profitability, risks and stability.
Second, initial deposit does not indicate any risk in any way, in spite of common misconceptions. You can use the amount of the deposit that is equal or higher than 100%, but it does not exceed the 5-10% drawdown. Loading of the deposit is not a risk, it is a degree of completeness of the use of available funds. The higher the deposit load - the better the money works, rather than lies as dust under the mattress. For example, let me give my own figures - deposit load is 94% when maximum drawdown is 5.44%. Only Igor Rybakov has better results in this ratio.
Conclusion - deposit loading is like an umbrella for fish in the second nomination.
found just a megabag in my EA.
hopefully things will be better in May. Thank you
Can you tell me why I can't find the MT4 server?
Internet environment is heterogeneous, try later
First of all, the second nomination assesses the effectiveness of the strategy: a comprehensive assessment of profitability, risk and stability.
Secondly, the deposit load in no way indicates the risks, contrary to common misconceptions. You can increase the deposit amount by 100% and more, but it will not exceed 5-10% of the drawdown. Loading of the deposit is not a risk, it is a degree of completeness of the use of available funds. The higher the deposit load - the better the money works, rather than lies as dust under the mattress. For example, let me give my indicators - deposit load is 94% when maximum drawdown is 5.44%. Only Igor Rybakov has better results in this ratio.
Conclusion - deposit loading is like an umbrella for fish in the second nomination.
If you want to load the deposit as much as you can, the main thing is to find a reasonable stop loss,
If you want to bog the deposit down to the last hurdle - then the main thing is to find a reasonable stop.
Why not?! The lower the deposit load, the higher the rating should be in the second category.
Volodya, it probably makes more sense to have a stop and a drawdown!
Well, if the guy skillfully enters on spreads - even on ALL of the depo and at the same time does not allow the insane drawdown - limiting itself to a stop - then why not!
The internet is heterogeneous, try later
Thank you, Yuri!
What is heterogeneous ?