As this is the first championship, so to speak, and it was organised quickly, there is no need to change anything, but if future ones will be, it is necessary to work out the rating on several indicators. I proposed a rating calculation for discussion, but no one has commented on it.
Sergey Gritsay: Since this is the first Championship, so to speak, and it has been organized quickly, nothing needs to be changed, but if there are future championships, the rating should be developed based on several indicators. I offered the rating calculation for discussion, but no one expressed anything.
Yes, of course - of course. It's just a matter of working out sensible rules based on the results, perhaps through a poll of participants.
well, let's say:
- A minimum of 5 trades - should be done in a month.
- maybe a lot limit in one order - or the total number of lots in a large group of orders
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
Haven't done any trades yet, wanted to sign up for a signal ))
I won't subscribe now.
Since this is the first Championship, so to speak, and it has been organized quickly, nothing needs to be changed, but if there are future championships, the rating should be developed based on several indicators. I offered the rating calculation for discussion, but no one expressed anything.
Yes, of course - of course. It's just a matter of working out sensible rules based on the results, perhaps through a poll of participants.
well, let's say:
- A minimum of 5 trades - should be done in a month.
- maybe a lot limit in one order - or the total number of lots in a large group of orders
I don't know, we should discuss it together.
Thank you, patthalom! ))))
Get out from under the table already - and get in on a few deals :-)
Yes, of course - of course. It's just a matter of working out sensible rules based on the results, perhaps through a poll of participants.
well, let's say:
- minimum of 5 deals - must be done in a month.
- maybe a lot limit in one order - or a total amount of lots in a large group of orders
I don't know, we have to discuss it together.
I do not know, we should discuss it together.
The most important and real parameter - it is the profitability of invested funds, i.e. the profitability.
And change the name of the event, sparring has put me off, I'm not going to participate in sparring.
Would participate too, never missed a championship.
Just don't make it any harder than it has to be.
The most important and real parameter is the return on investment, i.e. profitability.
And change the name of the event, sparring has put me off, I'm not going to participate in sparring.
I would participate too, I've never missed a championship.
But don't make it any harder than it has to be.
The most important and real parameter is the return on investment, i.e. profitability.
And change the name of the event, sparring has put me off, I'm not going to participate in sparring.
I would also take part, I have never missed a championship.
While we are thinking about the rules and the name of the next competition, sparring is preparation.
I have to engrave something on the cup for the next contest ........ We're thinking.
Yura, do not register more participants without verification - this rule will always be
PS. The last person to register will be the last one.