artmedia70: Wrong. I make my own experts that do not analyse the past. They work according to the current state of affairs. And this, by the way, is simple...
)They work according to the current situation, but how did you build/select your experts? Did you not use historical data at all?
It is like constructing a regression equation using historical data, and then substituting current data into the resulting equation and proudly claiming that the equation "does not analyse the past"
Artyom, isn't what you see on the graph, or what you've just learned, already the past?
The boundary between the past and the future is clearly defined.
Again... the man said that all councillors only work by history. He didn't say that EVERYTHING, EVERYTHING in this world is built on that. I replied, dissentingly, that my councillors don't need that understanding of history that is being discussed everywhere. I guess I was wrong, since indeed EVERYTHING in this world is built on nothing but memories...
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
All experts are based on an analysis of past price behaviour. That's it. And who takes what into account is up to them.
Wrong. I make my own experts who do not analyse the past. They work from the current state of affairs. And that, by the way, is just...
Wrong. I make my own experts that do not analyse the past. They work according to the current state of affairs. And this, by the way, is simple...
)They work according to the current situation, but how did you build/select your experts? Did you not use historical data at all?
It is like constructing a regression equation using historical data, and then substituting current data into the resulting equation and proudly claiming that the equation "does not analyse the past"
all scientific methods are based on studying the history of an object's behaviour in the past - no other methods have yet been invented by humanity.
Wrong. I make my own experts who don't analyse the past. They work on the current state of affairs. And that, by the way, is just...
Artyom, isn't what you see on the graph, or what you've just learned, already the past?
The boundary between the past and the future is clearly defined.
Oh, you're on. I give up... Let my opinion go with me to my grave. (SIGHS) OKAY.
Oh, you're on. I give up... Let my opinion go with me to my grave. (SIGHS) OKAY.
Artyom, isn't what you see on the graph, or what you've just learned, already the past?
The boundary between the past and the future is clearly defined.
No, no, don't give up! Otherwise, you'll be a grave on the forum.