Using neural networks in trading - page 7

 
DhP:
Standard indicators are a reliable basis for successful trading. Recommended.
I have publicly available induks working successfully in EAs for a long period only if + martin.
 
khorosh:
I've had publicly available indies work successfully in EAs for a long period only if + martin.

And that's fair enough.

Aswmlab wrote above "It is impossible to predict the movement of an individual molecule in a gas." i.e. totally unexpected and unpredictable movements happen, but they can be countered with alarge lot.

 
DhP:

And that's fair enough.

Aswmlab wrote above "It is impossible to predict the movement of an individual molecule in a gas." I.e. totally unexpected and unpredictable movements happen, but they can be countered with alarge lot.


And hello cola walrus. So the indicators are empty, aren't they? If you have to screw in a martin. The signal-entry-signal-out, or flip, or close by equity, then I will believe in efficiency, but it's still random.
 
grell:

And hello Kolya walrus. So the indicators are empty, right? Since we have to add a martin. The signal-entry-signal-out, or flip, or close by equity, then I will believe in efficiency, but it is still random.

No, you are wrong.

Keep a close eye on the indicators. They will tell you whether you should roll over with abig lot or wait for a reversal and open with abig lot.

The indicators see it. You should also see it without panic.

 
DhP:

No, you are wrong.

Keep a close eye on the indicators. They are the ones that will tell you whether you should roll over with abig lot or wait for a reversal and open with abig lot.

The indicators see it. You should be able to see it without panicking.




Please, this is self-deception:) either a bigger lot as compensation for the loss (as an excuse, oh-oh-oh, what an interesting thing happened, blah-blah-blah, wanted profit - got regular, but no, it's not a mistake, it's an excuse to open a bigger lot), or greed.
 
gpwr:

Very much needed. Without feelings, there is no intelligence. Suppose we created a robot capable of seeing and recognising objects, hearing and understanding speech, moving its arms and legs, etc. Turn on the ON button and ... Question to all. What will this robot do after it is turned on?

Probably it will get ready to take over the world. :)))
 
grell:


Please, this is self-deception:) either a bigger lot as compensation for the loss (as an excuse, oh-oh-oh, what an interesting thing happened, blah-blah-blah, wanted a profit - got the usual, but no, this is not a mistake, this is an excuse to open a larger lot), or greed.
If you want to find an infallible TS, that's naivety, there is no such thing.
 
grell:
Please, this is self-deception:) either a bigger lot as compensation for a loss (as an excuse, oh-oh-oh, that's how interesting it is, blah-blah-blah, I wanted a profit - I got the usual, but no, it's not a mistake, it's an excuse to open with a bigger lot), or greed.
At one time Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake just because he couldn't see what was obvious to him.
 
khorosh:
If you want to find an infallible TS, that's naive, there's no such thing.



DhP: I agree.
DhP:
At one time Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake just because he couldn't see what was obvious to him.


And how many witches were burned.... What's your point?
 
grell:


Agreed.
And how many witches have been burned.... What's your point?

stay focused !!! keep looking at the indicators !!!