FOREX - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Episode 17: July 2012) - page 17
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't understand and don't know the processes... But man, they have a staff of analysts, do you think they don't know about the stock market reports that we mere mortals are discussing here?)
I would understand about the non-reportable positions (stupid money).
http://www.alpari.ru/ru/school/events/kiev-cftc/ This workshop)
Yeah, yeah. That's exactly what I mean... Watched it myself several times (frame by frame) on tape... :-)
all your SOT indictors are pseudo-scientific nonsense ))))
all your SOT indictors are pseudo-scientific nonsense ))))
I don't understand and don't know the processes... but man, they have a lot of analysts, do you think they don't know about the exchange reports that we mere mortals are discussing here?)
I would have understood about the losing nonreportable positions (stupid money).
The question is different: there is such a notion in owl development as programming trading signal options (through optimization). Here - the order of interpretation of this or that indicator from one market participant or another.
Is there any proof?
Yes. If you ask yourself why the price goes up or down, you will also understand
The question is different: there is such a concept in the development of owls as programming trading signal options (through optimisation). Here - the order of interpretation of one or another indicator from one or another market participant.
I think something can be squeezed out of this approach, but I am sceptical about a "clean" report, no matter what.
I' ve been pushing on all fumes since last March!:-)
Yes. If you ask yourself why the price is going up or down, it will also become clear to you.
the leading Alpari analyst shorts (he often speaks on RBC). did he not read the report on operators' positions?)
Because an analyst and a trader are two different things)))
About masking positions by operators: tell everyone the truth and no one will believe you)))