[ARCHIVE!] Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass by. Can't go anywhere without you - 4. - page 285

New comment
 
You, my dear, should be a little louder in your indignation, you might even get a reprisal, I have clearly laid out the solutions to your problems. You come to "someone else's monastery" - be kind enough to comply with its rules. Regarding you personally - with your posts, you directly show at least contempt for those who implement these strategies in the code, and what do you think will be the reaction?
 
Skif_7:
I don't think that's what I asked... But never mind, I'm not very good at understanding. Are you another jobber from the job? It's interesting how things work - all those pros are sitting there, all their work brings millions to previous customers, and you're begging for 100 rubles for a simple code as I understand it. And when asked "Who knows whether there is an Expert Advisor ..." you start talking rubbish. I asked everyone who knows? If anyone knows he will answer. And those who do not know will keep quiet! What does "Seek"? Or "You've got a job to do"??? Or are you just making fun of mere mortals out of your genius???
It's a kind of professional snobbery... A plumber used to gleefully argue that everyone is obligated to learn the secrets of plumbing, a car mechanic will also argue the importance of his profession and look down on those who are not willing to spend their lives learning the great mysteries of auto repair ... A chemist looks down on non-chemists a physicist on non-physicists a lyricist on non-lyricists is not surprising... it's the basis of their self-assertion... It's just somehow forgotten...this is the help section for the inept...I think so... Perhaps instead of a beginner's help section, it would be more profitable and practical to post the "ALL IN JOB!!!" banner.
 
FAQ:
You, my dear, should be a little louder in your indignation, you might even get a reprisal, I have clearly laid out the ways of solving your problems. You come to "someone else's monastery" - be kind enough to comply with its rules. With regard to you personally - by your posts, you directly show at least contempt for those who implement these strategies in the code, and what do you think will be the reaction?
Mr. Moderator, do your superiors know what you're doing here?
 
Look at the topic (description) of the forum, it is a forum for programmers of trading systems in the algorithmic language of the MetaTrader 4 trading terminal, and therefore the topic refers to programming newbies.
 
pokerface:
It's a form of professional snobbery... A plumber argued until hoarsely that everyone is obligated to learn the secrets of plumbing, an automotive engineer will also argue the importance of his profession and look down on the inept who are not willing to spend their lives learning the great mysteries of auto repair ... A chemist looks down on non-chemists a physicist on non-physicists a lyricist on non-lyricists is not surprising... it's the basis of their self-assertion... It's just somehow forgotten...this is the help section for the inept...I think so... Perhaps instead of a beginner's help section it would be better and more practical to put a "ALL IN JOB!!!" banner.

Write a couple of lines in mql, then sign up as a rookie. And give your duplicate some advice.

In the meantime you both look like aggressive freeloaders.

 
pokerface:
Mr. Moderator! Does your superiors know what you are doing here?


You go complain.

1) The moderator is always right.

2) If he is wrong, see point 1.

 
No one is born a programmer... every professional has gone through a stage of ineptitude at one time or another... and there's no need to bully anyone... the rules of the forum have not been broken... it's up to you to enforce them.
 
Why complain? The disenfranchised vote with their feet...)
 
Right, so you start, try something and then you will get the help you need.
 
By the way, I can write a couple of lines in mql... but it's not appropriate for a moderator to misspell... the word "refers" in the context you are using is spelled without a soft sign.
1...278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292...632
New comment