You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Are you fantasising or do you want to be a hero? I've never noticed before that you're just a writer, not a reader... I've already told you:
Mathemat: Not at all. If it's not an advertisement for the purpose of selling - welcome! Even now you can create a thread and share it with whomever you want. You won't break any forum rules.
Are you fantasising or do you want to be a hero? I've never noticed before that you're just a writer, not a reader... I've already answered you:
Alexey, a link to a third-party resource where people earn (rather than lose as in Forex) money would be a direct violation of paragraph 1 of section 3 (Prohibited) of the Rules.
That would be advertising, well, not for the purpose of selling, but for the purpose of, say, attracting participants.
Just in case, let me remind you that I have yet to use the indulgence on the one-off "open your face" promotion.
You have to understand that the forex market does not lend itself to a rigid, mathematical logic based on a mathematical formula. The most suitable model for it is fuzzy logic. And it does not always work.)
What does this conclusion imply? Is there an example of applying NL-based models to forex?
There were. I did it a long time ago. I gave it up when I found better models. I wrote.
LeoV : And it doesn't always work )))
What in the forex market always works though? )))) - nothing.
Maybe it makes sense to go back to them? ))))
There were. I did it a long time ago. I gave it up because I found better models. I wrote.
Though what in the forex market always works? )))) - Nothing.
Maybe it makes sense to go back to them? ))))
Show me an example of the application of NL. And where does the conclusion - "the forex market does not lend itself to a rigid, mathematical logic based on a mathematical formula"?
The conclusion follows from here
The conclusion follows from here.
I have read it five times from top to bottom and vice versa - I do not see it there. Where does this conclusion come from? The topic writer has discovered an America "Testing on historical data is a necessary, but not sufficient condition to ensure the probability of a positive outcome of your trade in the future" - well, everyone knew about it without him. So? Why can't forex be mathematically logical and formulaic?
Or did you write it that way - to kick the writer?
Well, if it does, then show us the market formula and we'll close the subject ))))
Run the autoregressive analysis module and you will get the formula