Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
No, they're not equivalent. You still have to group them into groups of four to see how many sixes there are.
In centurions, or legions, I'd understand. Why four of each?
I get it, I'm a bit of a klutz. Time for bed :)
Because the elementary event (the outcome of the trial) is "falling at least one six in four rolls".
Surprise. It isn't.
Svetlana, excuse me - we've been having a little chat with the namesake. What are you doing this morning?
Do you want to invite me to a movie? :)
Yeah, for a cup of tea...
Jackass. :)
Thank you :)
I'll surprise you. It isn't.
Look here, namesake, this is a simulation of a game of maths (4 dice), a hundred million games:
Result:
The simulation of a uniform distribution from 1 to 6 is not very accurate, but the error is small, no more than 0.001.
The S.Q. of the frequency deviation from the probability is MathSqrt( npq ) / n ~ 1/20000, so here too you have no chance of getting close to p=2/3.
The exact value of the probability (or...er...m.o. frequency) is 1 - (5/6)^4 ~ 0.517747.