I'm sure there are a lot of programmers writing custom systems, but look at the same ones. But maybe no one has ordered a system that eventually became stable and I'm sure a person who owns it would stop writing EAs for $50-100, but they keep writing => no stable profitable systems :-)
I'm getting banned here :-D
No, they won't.
According to one local venerable coder, the probability of encountering something really interesting and worth checking is very low, at the level of the far tail of the standard normal distribution :)
The rest are primitive, which the customers themselves often consider something brilliant and worthy that the coder should pay more money for a brilliant idea.
There's an interview with Elder published here. Try and get in touch with him, just in case...
Well even here is a deception methaquota run a cloud service promising even up to 30 quid a month from the machine. i got excited all three of my servers one 4-processor 2 duplexes running as a result service sees only one 4-processor and the rest do not see although in the statistics they spin and used the cloud (not possible that they are outside one ip hanging but then use only one so no they use all three but pay for one and a penny more electricity eats). and eventually a week for only 4 cents - oh HOW
According to one local venerable coder, the probability of encountering something really interesting and worth checking is very low, at the level of the far tail of the standard normal distribution :)
Everything else is primitive, which the customers themselves often think is something brilliant and worthy of the coder to pay them for the diamond idea.
There's an interview with Elder published here. Try and get in touch with him, just in case...
Thanks for the advice and understanding of my question I was just skype chatting with Vinin today he also sent me to this article :-)
paukas: Question. What is the average profit per trade and average loss per trade in pips of your system?
I stopped using my previous system. There is a link to the current system on the front page. but it's been running for less than 1.5 months so it's hard to judge yet and I'll post the tester later
I stopped using the previous system. There is a link to the current system on the first page. but it has been running for less than 1.5 months, so it's hard to judge yet and I will post the tester later.
You see, your losing trade is twice as big as your profitable one. Try it the other way round.
paukas: You see, your losing trade is twice as big as your profitable trade.
I agree it's more but it's in the current optimization, but we are getting away from the subject. Everything is always beautiful in testers. In real trading it is different. (By the way, also interesting oil about the tester and reales).
If you think that the technical analysis has an error, you may use a different terminal and the same indicator shows with an error, i.e. it is not equal. All depends on the date of coming quotes, so the technical analysis is inaccurate and for example on a desktop PC you start testing and everything is OK and then you put it on the server and it is the opposite. It is not an easy task to some extent as well. So, there are only pitfalls.
I'm sure there are a lot of programmers writing custom systems, but look at the same ones. But maybe no one has ordered a system that eventually became stable and I'm sure a person who owns it would stop writing EAs for $50-100, but they keep writing => no stable profitable systems :-)
I'm getting banned here :-D
No, they won't.
According to one local venerable coder, the probability of encountering something really interesting and worth checking is very low, at the level of the far tail of the standard normal distribution :)
The rest are primitive, which the customers themselves often consider something brilliant and worthy that the coder should pay more money for a brilliant idea.
There's an interview with Elder published here. Try and get in touch with him, just in case...
No, they won't.
According to one local venerable coder, the probability of encountering something really interesting and worth checking is very low, at the level of the far tail of the standard normal distribution :)
Everything else is primitive, which the customers themselves often think is something brilliant and worthy of the coder to pay them for the diamond idea.
There's an interview with Elder published here. Try and get in touch with him, just in case...
Thanks for the advice and understanding of my question I was just skype chatting with Vinin today he also sent me to this article :-)
Good day!!!
I am a programmer looking for a stable trading system for almost 5 years. I have not come to stability, moreover, I am losing.
I got the impression that FOREX is a casino to earn (win) is not possible!
What do you think about it, dear forum users?
Question. What is the average profit per trade and average loss per trade in pips of your system?
I stopped using my previous system. There is a link to the current system on the front page. but it's been running for less than 1.5 months so it's hard to judge yet and I'll post the tester later
This is for paukas
Strategy Tester: NeuroNet
I stopped using the previous system. There is a link to the current system on the first page. but it has been running for less than 1.5 months, so it's hard to judge yet and I will post the tester later.
You see, your losing trade is twice as big as your profitable trade.
Strategy Tester: NeuroNetI agree it's more but it's in the current optimization, but we are getting away from the subject. Everything is always beautiful in testers. In real trading it is different. (By the way, also interesting oil about the tester and reales).
What is the problem?
If you think that the technical analysis has an error, you may use a different terminal and the same indicator shows with an error, i.e. it is not equal. All depends on the date of coming quotes, so the technical analysis is inaccurate and for example on a desktop PC you start testing and everything is OK and then you put it on the server and it is the opposite. It is not an easy task to some extent as well. So, there are only pitfalls.