OnGoing: Thanks for the insight) However, I didn't mean to classify systems by type. Even if the stop is small or large, where have you seen a system that beat the spread? I have not yet)
What is the meaning of "system that beats the spread"?
Eurobucks, M5, I have reached the parameters by means of optimization:
Mul_TP = 4; Mul_Sl = 1, i.e. 4:1 ratio of take and stop, the channel width (stop size) - dynamic - according to ATR - Period_ATR = 150 (during testing, there was chatter around 50 true points (4-digit), ie anywhere from 40 to 60 - max), the filter trade by time - disabled and the values of variables indicator OSMA following:
Eurobucks, M5, I have reached the parameters by means of optimization:
Mul_TP = 4; Mul_Sl = 1, i.e. 4:1 ratio of take and stop, the channel width (stop size) - dynamic - according to ATR - Period_ATR = 150 (during testing, there was chatter around 50 true points (4-digit), ie anywhere from 40 to 60 - max), the filter trade by time - disabled and the values of variables indicator OSMA following:
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
Thanks for the insight) However, I didn't mean to classify systems by type. Even if the stop is small or large, where have you seen a system that beat the spread? I have not yet)
What meaning do you give to "a system that beats the spread"?
What meaning do you give to "a system that beats the spread"?
He must have meant to be able to drain at a rate slower than the spread))).
He must have meant to drain at a slower speed than the SPRED))).
TM with MM by HERCHICK!
WORKING! :-)
Eurobucks, M5, I have reached the parameters by means of optimization:
Mul_TP = 4; Mul_Sl = 1, i.e. 4:1 ratio of take and stop, the channel width (stop size) - dynamic - according to ATR - Period_ATR = 150 (during testing, there was chatter around 50 true points (4-digit), ie anywhere from 40 to 60 - max), the filter trade by time - disabled and the values of variables indicator OSMA following:
Filter.Hour=0; Start=3; End=19; Fast=6; Slow=40; Signal=24;
LOT SUSTAINED - 0,1 - without increase and without any shares with averaging.
There can be ONLY ONE ORDER in the market at a time. There is no trall.
The trick is that with almost "random" entries (minimum TA) the owls take out the DEP in profit due to the ratio of stops and takeovers = 1:4!
TM with MM by HERCHICK!
WORKING! :-)
Eurobucks, M5, I have reached the parameters by means of optimization:
Mul_TP = 4; Mul_Sl = 1, i.e. 4:1 ratio of take and stop, the channel width (stop size) - dynamic - according to ATR - Period_ATR = 150 (during testing, there was chatter around 50 true points (4-digit), ie anywhere from 40 to 60 - max), the filter trade by time - disabled and the values of variables indicator OSMA following:
Filter.Hour=0; Start=3; End=19; Fast=6; Slow=40; Signal=24;
LOT SUSTAINED - 0,1 - without increase and without any shares with averaging.
There can be ONLY ONE ORDER in the market at a time. There is no trall.
The trick is that with almost "random" entries (minimum TA) the owls take out the DEP in profit due to the ratio of stops and takeovers = 1:4!
Check in the tester on ticks and compare the result.
Checking... The parameters are the same.
You mean the results are the same?
The difference is evident, but it's still a bit uphill... :-)