Prepared a version of the EA with martin for testing on a real account. The profit is not very high (compared to Ilan), but the EA is stable on the whole history. What's your opinion?
Prepared a version of the EA with martin for testing on the real account. The profit is not very high (compared to Ilan), but the EA is stable on the whole history. What are your thoughts?
Roman.: It's perfect, Yuri! PV=9.14! I'm ready to buy this miracle from you...
Whether everything is fine will show in real life, but so far the prototype of this version worked on the demo for a little less than a month successfully. As for buying, I'm sorry, as the trading business, which I did for some time before retiring, I got bored and agree to earn with the EA, using it for its direct purpose, rather than by selling it is much more interesting).
khorosh: Whether all is perfect will be shown by the real, but so far the prototype of this version has worked on the demo for a little less than a month successfully. As for buying, I'm sorry, as the trading business, which I did for a while before retiring, got bored and agreeing to earn with an EA, using it for its direct purpose and not by selling it is much more interesting).
Prepared a version of the EA with martin for testing on a real account. The profit is not very high (compared to Ilan), but the EA is stable on the whole history. What is your opinion?
imho, of course, but if you have big volume increments at flat, then it's still there and there, because even in calm conditions the major players will rock the boat for sure, but if it is in a strong trend, then I think you got my point
If it is a strong trend, then I think you got my point ... HZZ: as I understood from the chart, you are not increasing the starting lot in proportion to the deposit and for objective evaluation - oh what a waste...
khorosh: Whether all is perfect will be shown by the real, but so far the prototype of this version has worked on the demo for a little less than a month successfully. As for buying, I'm sorry, the trading business, which I was doing for a while before retiring, has bored me and agree to earn with the EA, using it for its direct purpose and not by selling it is much more interesting).
i'm looking at a 38% drawdown and wondering why you don't add mm to it? the drawdown will surely come with the growth of the depo!
I've tried it without increasing the lot (i.e. increasing it proportionally to the growth of the deposit - to keep the proportion) and even without indices - it's too shaky:
I'm looking at a 38% drawdown and I'm thinking why don't you add more lots to it?!
Why do I need big lots? I'd rather withdraw my profit and put one more EA on another account. There are a lot of problems when working with large lots. I think you should understand them, and if you don't understand them, think about it).
Prepared a version of the EA with martin for testing on a real account. The profit is not very high (compared to Ilan), but the EA is stable on the whole history. What's your opinion?
Prepared a version of the EA with martin for testing on the real account. The profit is not very high (compared to Ilan), but the EA is stable on the whole history. What are your thoughts?
It's perfect, Yuri! PV=9.14! I'm ready to buy this miracle from you...
Whether all is perfect will be shown by the real, but so far the prototype of this version has worked on the demo for a little less than a month successfully. As for buying, I'm sorry, as the trading business, which I did for a while before retiring, got bored and agreeing to earn with an EA, using it for its direct purpose and not by selling it is much more interesting).
Prepared a version of the EA with martin for testing on a real account. The profit is not very high (compared to Ilan), but the EA is stable on the whole history. What is your opinion?
imho, of course, but if you have big volume increments at flat, then it's still there and there, because even in calm conditions the major players will rock the boat for sure, but if it is in a strong trend, then I think you got my point
If it is a strong trend, then I think you got my point ... HZZ: as I understood from the chart, you are not increasing the starting lot in proportion to the deposit and for objective evaluation - oh what a waste...
guys! Stop re-inventing the game! The market is risky! It's time to make some money!
You're looking for a guarantee!
There is no guarantee!
Guys! ... it's time to make some money!
...Well, we're already doing it!
Nevertheless, hazing in the army, ugh - market research has NOT BEEN TAKEN OFF!!! :-)
Whether all is perfect will be shown by the real, but so far the prototype of this version has worked on the demo for a little less than a month successfully. As for buying, I'm sorry, the trading business, which I was doing for a while before retiring, has bored me and agree to earn with the EA, using it for its direct purpose and not by selling it is much more interesting).
i'm looking at a 38% drawdown and wondering why you don't add mm to it? the drawdown will surely come with the growth of the depo!
I've tried it without increasing the lot (i.e. increasing it proportionally to the growth of the deposit - to keep the proportion) and even without indices - it's too shaky:
Strategy Tester: AbsoluteStrategy Tester Report
I'm looking at a 38% drawdown and I'm thinking why don't you add more lots to it?!