[Archive!] Ready to write EA for FREE !!!!! - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I seem to follow your posts, but strangely enough, I don't recall such a parade, although at this stage I am in the process of testing a similar idea, although everything looks mostly graphical
http://imglink.ru/pictures/21-11-11/53b259c78f8569acb28814549282eed9.jpg, researching statistics just about to be done
I did, I did, a few times...
yeah, something like that.
I.e., I work with customer to develop TOR down to mnemocode, and when the customer has thought out and approved the final version, then we write code. And the customer has no way to say that he didn't get what he wanted. And to get what he wants, the customer must also work with his head. The programmer's job is to translate the final result into codes.Ideally, the TOR should look something like this
This is actually what all the fuss is about, that there is not, and cannot be, an "ideal ToR". In the process of dialogue, there is always an exchange of views, clarifications and consultations. It is absolutely in any business, when a layman hires a specialist, be it in programming, construction or simply to go to the hairdresser.
Only I have not received a definite answer to my question, whether my simple description is enough for writing an EA or not.
My opinion is that it is enough. Maybe a few clarifications, no more. If in this case there will be a series of questions detailing the work of the EA, then I will doubt the professionalism of the person I am asking for money.
This is the whole point: there is no "perfect TOR" and there cannot be one. There is always an exchange of views, clarifications and consultations in the process of dialogue. It is absolutely in any business, when a layman hires a specialist, be it in programming, construction or simply to go to the hairdresser.
Only I have not received a definite answer to my question, whether my simple description is enough for writing an EA or not.
My opinion is that it is enough. Maybe a few clarifications, no more. If in this case there will be a series of questions detailing the work of the EA, then I will doubt the professionalism of the person I am asking for money.
You see, the customer and the programmer have completely different categories of thinking. And you are absolutely right when you talk about dialogue bringing the points of view closer together. It is a very broad subject. Mastery of the subject implies mastery of terminology. Simply put - the better one's command of terminology, the higher one is a pro. Customers often don't know the terminology at all. That's why there's no definite answer to your question. The main thing is that the coder and the customer understand each other, and for this the programmer must rise to the level of the customer or the customer must go down to the level of the programmer. In the end they must understand each other.
The programmer must know the language, but does not have to be an expert in forex strategies. I.e., he has an application tool, while you are the expert. It's like, for example, when you are renovating your home, you invite different specialists, who know different tools for solving your comfort problems. You will clearly assign them the task - water here, boiler here, cooker here, bedroom here, toilet here. And the specialists will solve the problem optimally, using the tools they have, but at a clear task setting.
If you don't want to negotiate, you're better off with a ready-made tool.
либо программист должен подняться до уровня заказчика, либо заказчик опуститься до уровня программиста
It's not a dilemma at all. Anyway, I see your point.
Ask the customer to start by running it manually, there are plenty of simulators in the kodobase.
First, it is clear that the strategy is profitable, and secondly, the programmer here for an hour of work, why spend a day? No smiley face.
You, Alexey, are on the wrong side of the ice. From the customer's side, spending a day on trading (and before that finding and dealing with the simulator) is a completely unnecessary action.
I don't know why I decided to try it, but I've already understood that it is a profitable strategy. No smiley face.
All those who write "first check with your hands" or "give me a statement" for at least half a year, or better yet 10 years, are out of some kind of internal gloating. You are also deceiving yourself, but where are the indicators such as stability of the strategy, resistance to market changes? And what is the strategy tester for, if not for validation in time and for saving it when testing ideas. And so it turns out that for one successful trader there are a hundred programmers, and for one professional programmer there are a hundred non-traders and those who cannot program (conditionally of course), but everyone wants to earn.
Sometimes they give such TOR that you tell the customer - my dear man, we ate it and pooped it out a long time ago, it does not work - but no, he does not. A trader cannot become successful if he goes all the way by himself from the beginning and kicks his own knees. And no one here gloats - if you want to ride a bike, you have to pop. No ready-made recipes will save you. In addition, I am convinced thatthe successful self-employedtrader must have at least minimal programming skills (this site is intended to help traders master programming). Learn the language and they will help you. A profitable strategy should not only take into account price movements, but also the deceit of DC, and power outage, and the fall of the Internet, and the mood of you and your family and probably a lot of factors. The tester is no help to you here.