There's a catch somewhere... - page 6

New comment
 
Cmu4:

Then you don't know how to cook it. Me neither - I'm just learning. :)
And who is your number one enemy? The trader himself?:))

If a trader admits to himself that he does not know where the price is going, he is not an enemy.
 
Cmu4:


And if we do:

TP=Level+(Ask-Bid);

SL=Level-(Ask-Bid);

Then the spread will be taken into account... right?

It makes no difference. The money will be taken all the same. Exactly the spread per transaction.
 
paukas:
It makes no difference. The money will be taken all the same. Exactly the spread per transaction.

Let them take it away - that can be accounted for. It's predictable. Or are you upset by the fact that the spread will inevitably be taken away? :)
 

If you work in forex, 1:50 is better.

If gambling, 1:1000

 
valenok2003:

If you work in forex, 1:50 is better.

If gambling, 1:1000


What prevents you from trading at 1:1,000, like at 1:50?
 
Cmu4:

Let them take it away - that can be accounted for. It's predictable, isn't it? Or is it the fact that the spread will be taken away that bothers you? :)

When we are young, we all think - what the hell is this spread, a couple of points. Then we have an epiphany.

 
The higher the leverage, the more reliable the drain, especially if the account is micro.
 
valenok2003:
The higher the leverage, the more reliable the drain, especially if the account is micro.

Justify.
 
valenok2003:

If you work in forex, 1:50 is better.

If gambling, 1:1000

If you work in the casino, you have to put chips by 10 rubles, and if you play, then by 200 rubles (that's the sense). In general, it is necessary to give TS to manifest the statistics of transactions - 100, and if three SL and no depo, and it is unclear whether there is or is not a TS.
 
Cmu4:

Justify.

There are two meanings to the term "leverage":

1. the ratio of the collateral to the lot

2.The ratio of own funds to borrowed funds.

He is talking about leverage in the second sense.

123456789
New comment