Mechanisation of optimal parameter selection. Finding a common denominator. - page 11

New comment
 
lasso:

Good. Let's go at it from the other side...

By what criteria can we say that this TC is not bullshit?


By the name - the TS is bullshit.
 
Tantrik:

the name is crap.


And bullshit is the shade on the bed from the bullshit leaves after optimizing the crops

It's finally all sorted out. The main thing is a constructive approach.

 
lasso:

Good. Let's go at it from the other side...

By what criteria can we say that this TC is not bullshit?

According to paukas, if there can be a case of a good fit when optimising it.
 
Mischek:


And horseradish is the shade on the bed from the horseradish leaves after crop optimization

It's finally all sorted out. The main thing is a constructive approach.

No of course, everything will stay the same (95/5).
 
khorosh:
According to paukas, if there can be a case of a good fit when optimising it.
Don't say shit for others. They can do it themselves))
 
paukas:
By having an idea. Simple and clear.
What is complicated and unclear to you about MovingAverage?
 
lasso:

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Stop. What's wrong with Masha MT?

A spread-driven advisor that's steadily losing on all available history. Yeah, whatever. What do we care? We got an auto-optimized TS.

Not satisfied with anything. Optimization for optimization's sake? This is all the more unconstructive.
 
lasso:
What is difficult and confusing for you about MovingAverage?

You haven't noticed, Paukas still has the idea written down.
 
paukas:
Don't say shit for others. They can do it themselves))
You won't get anywhere in this thread or the next. (you can check my prediction over time)
 
Tantrik:
You won't get anywhere in this thread or the next. (You can check my prediction in due course)
What's going to happen? Tell me.
1...45678910111213141516171819
New comment