Mechanisation of optimal parameter selection. Finding a common denominator. - page 10

New comment
 
OnGoing:
I see, Slava shared his profits with you?))
You're certainly plotting a revolution - sharing other people's profits :)
 
OnGoing:
I see, Slava shared his profits with you ?))

Is that the only explanation you can think of? ))
 
Mischek:

Is that the only explanation you can think of? ))
Silence... Silence...)
 
OnGoing:
Silence... Silence...)
Mechanization is for MTS (deaf and blind robots), but as it is simple (profitable) a trader can trade simply (buy and sell) without bothering with forwards and without looking back at history. Profits!
 
Tantrik:
Mechanisation is for MTS (deaf and blind robots), but this way the trader can trade simply (buy and sell) without bothering with forwards and without looking back at history. Profits!
Indeed. So they buy on the left and sell on the right, without thinking about it. For non-profits traders it's that simple ))
 
Figar0:

That's not constructive, it's overhyped) In addition to a good set, there has to be a meaningful robust system and the mash from the MT4 delivery is not one of them.
TheXpert:

It's not constructive. What is the point of adjusting the regular EA?

Let me give you a random series and then you adjust the EA so that it is in the plus position in REF.


Wait. Stop. What's wrong with Masha's MT?

It's a stable spread-driven EA on the entire available history. Yeah, whatever. What do we care? We have an auto-optimized TS.

Having removed the spread and swap, we obtain a balanced TS with MO -> 0.

If we optimize three parameters of Macha MT, say, periods from 1 to 100, and Shift from 0 to 21, we obtain with each optimization 210 000 results of 210 000 TS.

The task, as formulated by Vladimir, is to find "good sets" which together (with OOS gluing) will yield MO on the whole available history, say, more than four spreads.

ARE THERE NO SUCH "GOOD SETS" AMONG 210,000 MT OPTIMIZATION RESULTS AT ALL???

THERE'S AT LEAST 20% OF THEM!!!

-----------------

If you consistently hit that 20%, then you have a super TS on a simple MA.

Machines like a weasel.... ))

 
lasso:

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Stop. What's wrong with Masha's MT?

A steadily leaking on the spread on all the available history of the EA. Yeah, and fuck it. What do we care, we have an auto-optimised TS.

By removing the spread and swap, we obtain a balanced TP with MO -> 0.

If we optimize three parameters of МТ Mashe, say, periods from 1 to 100, and Shift from 0 to 21, we obtain 210 000 results of 210 000 TS at every optimization.

The task, as formulated by Vladimir, is to find "good sets" which together (with OOS gluing) will yield MO on the whole available history, say, more than four spreads.

ARE THERE NO SUCH "GOOD SETS" AMONG 210,000 MT OPTIMIZATION RESULTS AT ALL???

THERE'S AT LEAST 20% OF THEM!!!

We'll have to do it again. You can't optimise shit. We need an idea.
 
paukas:
Indeed. Left foot in - buy, right foot out - sell and don't bother. It's all so easy for non-decent traders ))
For the non-decent traders it's easy ) - it's an ace, so tweaking, optimization and over-optimization are possible. (that's what you do, and good luck to you!)
 
paukas:
We'll have to do it again. You can't optimise shit.

Good. Let's go in from the other side...

By what criteria can we say that this TS is not bullshit?

 
lasso:

Good. Let's go at it from the other side...

By what criteria can we say that this TC is not bullshit?

By the presence of an idea. Simple and understandable.
1...34567891011121314151617...19
New comment
Reason: