The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 77

New comment
 
Demi:

Confused, bro - a bot's trading process cannot be non-deterministic, non-stochastic.

It depends on what you mean by that term. The way I see it, it can.
 
Avals:
built an automaton that outputs 0 and 1 when the button is pressed. If the millisecond at the time of pressing is even, it gives out 0, odd 1. If observer has no possibility to measure time with millisecond accuracy, then for him this automaton will give out random sequences, although in fact, the generation algorithm is deterministic. It is the same with any PRNG. I.e. it all comes down to availability of necessary control information to the observer and the rule of formation

)))))))) makes no difference to the bot's input. No role at all. None at all. At all. The work of the bot is deterministic. When a signal is received - it opens a position. Another signal comes - it closes.

Stochastic or deterministic are the results of bot's work - its inputs and outputs.

Milliseconds.... Quote is a random process, hence the crossing of two wagons is a random process. The bot receives a signal of crossover - it opens a position. Incoming signal (crossing) - random, outgoing signal (opening/closing) - random.

The work of the bot is a regular process. This algorithm

 
Demi:

)))))))) makes no difference to the bot's input. No role at all. None at all. At all. The work of the bot is deterministic. When a signal is received - it opens a position. Another signal comes - it closes.

Stochastic or deterministic are the results of bot's work - its inputs and outputs.

Milliseconds.... Crossing of two bots is a random process. The bot received a signal of crossover - it opened a position. Incoming signal (crossing) - random, outgoing (opening/closing) - random.

The work of the bot is a regular process. This is an algorithm

It's just that we don't know all the patterns, or don't have the necessary data to calculate them. God does not roll the dice)))
 
Avals:
in this formulation, if you do not know all Fi, you can predict F with some error. That is, the unknown Fi will be a source of stochasticity


These are just those small fluctuations in the background of the evolving process I mentioned earlier.
 
Avals:
Бог не бросает кости)))


Well, quantum mechanics has been kicked to the curb, too....
 
Demi:
Well, quantum mechanics has been kicked to the curb as well....
Theories and experiments with the microcosm are not proof or disproof. The case there is murky and they don't fully understand what is quantum etc.
 
avtomat:

These are just the small fluctuations in the evolutionary process that I mentioned earlier.
well, you can call them fluctuations too)) the same eggs in profile
 
Avals:
Well, you could also call them fluctuations)) the same eggs, side by side


eh.... noooo!!!

;)

 
Avals:
theories and experiments with the microcosm are not proof or disproof. The case there is murky and it is not fully understood that there is a quantum, etc.

and nobody is proving or disproving anything. It is a question of what is theorist and matstat - humanities or natural science
 
Demi:
and no one is proving or disproving anything. It is a question of whether theorising is a human science or a natural science

as any mathematics is to the exact))
1...707172737475767778798081828384...551
New comment