The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 128

 
FAGOTT:

The novelty here is, in fact, mind-blowing - you got your degree for nothing.

The main task of TAU is to have an incoming signal and obtain an outgoing signal with given characteristics by changing the controlling action.

Finding the correlation between past and present price is not ..... ah, ok, that train left long ago.

P.S. please consider me a parasite too


And this shows your militant ignorance.

.

Well, you are positioning yourself as a parasite...

 
FAGOTT:

The main task of the TAU is to have an incoming signal and obtain an outgoing signal with given characteristics by changing the control action.

Hee).

He's talking about Thomas, he's talking about Eremes.

Let "the main task of TAU" in your understanding is such.

True, there are no less important tasks - identification of the control object.

We cannot control the market - it is a fact.

It is not controlled by us. It is a control object for those who control it.

If we don't know the controllers' behavior from their typical incoming signals ( control signals) and their responses (output signals)

without having studied the typical input signals (control signals) and responses (output signals), planned by the managers, there is nothing to do in the market.

Only with knowledge of these "managerial" habits you can manage your trading.

 

But it's time to return to Yusuf's model.

After making the changes, I want to check again:

Is that correct, Yusuf?

 
sergeyas:

Heh.)

He's talking about Thomas, he's talking about Eremes.

Let the "main task", as you understand it, be such.

But there are no less important tasks - the identification of the control object.

We cannot control the market - it is a fact.

It is not managed by us. It is the object of those who control it.

There is nothing to do in the market without studying the habits of "managers" by typical, self-made incoming signals (control signals) and reactions (output signals), which they themselves have planned.

Only having knowledge about these "managers'" habits allows you to manage your trading.


There is a market - for example, EURUSD.

Suppose there is something/someone that exerts a controlling influence upon it. Obviously, the quotes are the incoming and outgoing signal for him. It is also obvious that the controlling influence on the market is not continuous but discrete.

You do not know the purpose of the controlling influence - whether the quotations go up or down at a given moment in time.

You do not know the nature of the manipulated influence - news, macro-statistics, opening and closing of positions.

You do not know the timing of the manipulation - what exactly was the news, what were the dynamics of quotes?

Bottom line - there is someone or something that has an unknown TR on the market at an unknown time...................

This is not an object of investigation by TAU, it is more a matter of conspiracy theories, conspiracy theories and psychiatry

 
sergeyas:

(Huh).

Again to the student canteen pie issue, the entire TAU methodology is based on changing SW and measuring the change in IS as a consequence. This is the basis of all assumptions about the functional dependence of VS-VS-IS.

Obviously, this does not apply to the market

 
FAGOTT:

There is a market - for example EURUSD.

Suppose there is something/someone exerting a controlling influence on it. Obviously, quotes are the incoming and outgoing signal for it. It is also obvious that the controlling influence on the market is not continuous but discrete.

You do not know the purpose of the controlling influence - whether the quotations go up or down at a given moment in time.

You do not know the nature of the controlling influence - news, macrostats, opening and closing of positions.

You do not know the timing of the manipulation - what exactly was the news, what were the dynamics of quotes?

Total known - there is someone or something that has an unknown TR on the market at an unknown time...................

This is not the object of the TAU study.

Makes sense.

Tomorrow someone somewhere will do something to someone.

How and with what can this be investigated?

 
sergeyas:

Makes sense.

Tomorrow someone somewhere is going to do something to someone.

How and what can this be investigated?


There is no way and nothing until all three parameters are identified
 
FAGOTT:
There is no way and nothing until all three parameters are identified

And you with your authority don't allow you to try to identify even in the past...

What to do(((?

All right, let's eat sunflower seeds.

 
sergeyas:

And you with your authority won't even allow me to try to identify...

What to do(((?

Do as you always do - look for dependencies in the coterie. That's what the whole forum does.

And this one, like yago - paws off the TAU!

 
FAGOTT:

Do as you always do - look for dependencies in the coterie. That's what the whole forum is doing.

And this one, like yago - paws off the TAU!

"If you do the same thing (as you always do) but only harder, we'll get the same thing" (C).
Reason: