[Archive! - page 47 1...404142434445464748495051525354...707 New comment Mikhail Dovbakh 2011.04.16 23:08 #461 moskitman: what's all this nonsense?Smoke on... What's the harm? ;) Mikhail Dovbakh 2011.04.16 23:13 #462 DhP: You don't speak well of those who are absent. And it turns out to be just "behind the scenes"... ))) I agree. Not tolerant of them. They have a job, we have a job. Who's to judge? ;) And about the criteria - can we wait for an answer? BBC 2011.04.16 23:26 #463 avatara: I agree. I don't tolerate them anymore. They have a job, we have a call... Who's to judge? ;) And about the criteria - can we wait for an answer? It is indescribable. The Russian language is rich, but apparently I don't know it well enough to put it into words. ))) Mikhail Dovbakh 2011.04.16 23:41 #464 DhP: This is indescribable. Rich is the Russian language, but apparently I don't know it well enough to put it into words. ))) Just to clarify - why some to the smoking room and others to the Nobel Committee? What is the difference in the original evidence? ;) BBC 2011.04.16 23:48 #465 avatara: Just to clarify - why do some go to the smoking room and others to the Nobel Committee? What is the difference in the original evidence? ;) And this question of yours is even harder to answer. Too thin a line between nutcase/genius/villain etc, maybe they just 'flow' from one state to the other Mikhail Dovbakh 2011.04.16 23:55 #466 DhP: And this question of yours is even harder to answer. Too thin a line between psycho/genius/villain etc, maybe they just 'flow' from one state to another That's a great topic somewhere - but on the lines you have. Can I have an answer? :) BBC 2011.04.16 23:59 #467 avatara: it's a great topic somewhere - but on the lines you have. Can I have an answer? :) You take me back to the beginning again.)) I've already admitted I can't explain it.... Mikhail Dovbakh 2011.04.17 00:07 #468 DhP: You take me back to the beginning again.))) I've already admitted I can't explain it.... But YOUR plea - To the stoner, the "smoker"! remains. Either disavow it - or defend it! BBC 2011.04.17 00:12 #469 avatara: But YOUR call for a "stoner, smoker" remains. Either disavow it - or defend it ! Why? Or do you sincerely believe that the truth is one? Ignorance... Mikhail Dovbakh 2011.04.17 00:18 #470 DhP: Why? Or do you sincerely believe that the truth is one? Ignorance! Then it's unpunished flubbing. Opinion either exists or it doesn't. Right! 1...404142434445464748495051525354...707 New comment
what's all this nonsense?
Smoke on...
What's the harm?
;)
You don't speak well of those who are absent.
And it turns out to be just "behind the scenes"... )))
I agree. Not tolerant of them.
They have a job, we have a job.
Who's to judge?
;)
And about the criteria - can we wait for an answer?
I agree. I don't tolerate them anymore.
They have a job, we have a call...
Who's to judge?
;)
And about the criteria - can we wait for an answer?
It is indescribable.
The Russian language is rich, but apparently I don't know it well enough to put it into words. )))
This is indescribable.
Rich is the Russian language, but apparently I don't know it well enough to put it into words. )))
Just to clarify - why some to the smoking room and others to the Nobel Committee?
What is the difference in the original evidence?
;)
Just to clarify - why do some go to the smoking room and others to the Nobel Committee?
What is the difference in the original evidence?
;)
And this question of yours is even harder to answer.
Too thin a line between nutcase/genius/villain etc, maybe they just 'flow' from one state to the other
And this question of yours is even harder to answer.
Too thin a line between psycho/genius/villain etc, maybe they just 'flow' from one state to another
That's a great topic somewhere - but on the lines you have. Can I have an answer?
:)
it's a great topic somewhere - but on the lines you have. Can I have an answer?
:)
You take me back to the beginning again.))
I've already admitted I can't explain it....
You take me back to the beginning again.)))
I've already admitted I can't explain it....
But YOUR plea - To the stoner, the "smoker"! remains.
Either disavow it - or defend it!
But YOUR call for a "stoner, smoker" remains.
Either disavow it - or defend it !
Why? Or do you sincerely believe that the truth is one?
Ignorance...
Why? Or do you sincerely believe that the truth is one?
Ignorance!
Then it's unpunished flubbing.
Opinion either exists or it doesn't.
Right!