
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Show first a 9-year forward test of some mediocre advisor of yours and we'll have something to talk about.
I don't have a mediocre one.
продемонстрируйте сначала форвард-тест за 9 лет какого-то своего заурядного советника - будет о чём поговорить.
Victor, there is nothing to talk about. Sorry, it's demagoguery all over again.
Your adaptivity is reduced to a single optimization in the tester. This is a distortion of the original notion of adaptivity: then we can safely say that 90% of all EAs made here are adaptive, since optimization is spoiled by almost everyone...
Your OTT consists of a single sentence, since you haven't provided any real mechanism for synchronizing s.f. with the market.
I have not yet found a single test from you about which you can say that in almost all cases (well 95%) the OOS test parameters (which can also be estimated using matstatistics) will remain reasonable for the trader.
One more thing: the forward test is set up differently, i.e. it assumes that the parameters change in some area of stability. You don't have that - and consequently there is no procedure to verify the stability of that test on OOS.
______________________________________
Until a final decision on the branch is made, it is closed to all comments, including technical comments. All comments after this post, not including moderated comments, will be deleted.