[Archive!] Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass it by. Couldn't go anywhere without you - 2. - page 120
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There is a lot of confusion from the question: what does this "WHAT'S NOTHING" look like? What did you expect when you checked "optimisation", did you know what it was for", did you check the "expert properties-> "input parameters" buttons?
uncheck - Visualisation - bottom left... Show the other tabs, i.e. Testing, Optimisation.
Looks like the terminal is having trouble paging history - 5 years on M15 is a lot, the terminal may not have that much. Try specifying a smaller date range, what happens?
The terminal generates you a tick history for the whole period, can you imagine how many ticks pass in 5 years :)))?
Optimisation of Take. Value = 150, start should then also be = 150 (by idea). But if you assume that the tester ignores that 150 and starts with 10 in increments = 10, then by the time it gets to 200, it will have done 20 tests.
Optimise the stop loss. Same thing - you have to start with the specified 50. Also, if we accept ignore and start with 15, then at a step of 10 more tests will be performed. The total amount of tests is 35.
Trailing. The same. Another 6 tests. In total, the tester has to run your Expert Advisor on the chart 41 times.
Wouldn't it be better to try to optimize parameters one by one, and specify the values in the "Value" and "Start" columns equal?
Try it.
Yes, of course I will..... But the situation is confusing! Okay, I won't bother.
Looks like the terminal is having trouble paging history - 5 years on M15 is a lot, the terminal may not have that much. Try specifying a smaller date range, what happens?
Well it goes well with the visualisation, and the modelling quality is great! Or maybe it's just a glitch, something with Windows already...
Or platform
Well, it goes well in the visualisation
Alternatively, try separately:
a) leave only one parameter to be optimised, for 2-3 passes
b) shorten the testing period
At least you'll find out what's causing the slowdown
Have you watched all five years of visualisations on the M15???
Yes, yes! I didn't change the time period at all.
Alternatively, try separately:
a) leave only one parameter to be optimised, for 2-3 passes
b) shorten the testing period
At least you'll find out what's causing the slowdown
Yeah. I'll give it a go.