Is the advisor suitable for real life? - page 27

 

Has the principle of operation been discussed elsewhere?


 
OnGoing:
In pips there is some kind of sawtooth, I wonder why.
probably because TP=SL/2
 

and the volume in the table is 281 lots - is this possible?

 
Cmu4:
probably because TP=SL/2
The balance is smooth, that's what's interesting. Locking, then?
 
rather TP/SL=480/600
 
OnGoing:
The balance sheet is smooth, that's what's interesting. Are we locking?

No, not locking. It's just that the monitoring is glitchy. Stops and profits are fixed and do not change.
 
YOUNGA:

Has the principle of operation been discussed elsewhere?



It has not been discussed in details. All we know is that it is trending on minutes.
 

I thought you were the creator (FOReignEXchange)




 
YOUNGA:

I thought you were the creator (FOReignEXchange)





Yes, the creator. I programmed and program myself. And I never use other people's code at all, and if I do, I only take the idea and completely rework the code.
 
YOUNGA:
rather TP/SL=480/600


This is not quite right. Profit 12 pips, stop 14 pips. Lot 4. It turns out 480/560. Sometimes there's a 1-point slippage when we put the orders in. And I get a stop of 15, a profit of 11. Damn, I just noticed. I probably narrowed the difference between profit and stop on purpose just in case. The first tests were done with stops at 11/15. So it's probably not a big deal that sometimes 1 point slips.

If the slippage becomes too big, then the code condition opens a trade from the market, this happened once yesterday. All other times the maximum slippage is like 1 point only. But it is absent in most cases.

Reason: