ERUUSD spectra - is this proof of non-stationarity? - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What do you mean by 'better'?
More precisely and not only that. You can selectively filter with bandpass filters and also suppress noise more effectively.
More accurately and not only that. You can selectively filter with bandpass filters and also suppress noise more effectively.
You see, this is all too abstract to be specific. What do you mean "precise"? Less delay, less lag? So there are already more modern algorithms that give less lag. Noise? The more you filter out the noise, the more delay you will get and the less movement you will take as the smaller movements will also be filtered out along with the noise. So it's not a fact that you need to suppress noise more effectively.......
You see, it's all too abstract to be concrete. What do you mean by 'specific'? Less delay, less lag? So there are more modern algorithms that give less lag. Noise? The more you filter out the noise, the more delay you will get and the less movement you will take as the smaller movements will also be filtered out along with the noise. So it's not a fact that you need to suppress noise more effectively.......
We have links at the bottom to branches of this forum that have answers to your questions. I have a different problem which has not been covered on those forums. I took the 240 bar window, I wanted to. The result is negative and it may be possible to get a different and maybe positive result with a different window. The issue of window size seems to be a matter of principle for me.
We have links at the bottom to branches of this forum where your questions are answered.
They're not my questions, by the way. It was you who asked -
I asked you -
You answered -
I didn't find a strong distinction between the word "better" and "more precise", so I tried to suggest what you might mean by those words -
You see, it's all too abstract to be specific. What do you mean by "precise"? Less delay, less lag? So there are already more modern algorithms that give less lag. Noise? The more you filter out the noise, the more delay you will get and the less movement you will take as the smaller movements will also be filtered out along with the noise. So it's not a fact that you need to suppress noise more effectively.......
With any window the spectrum will change.....
With any window the spectrum will change.....
That's what you have to prove.
That's what you have to prove.
Who? Me? I don't need to...)) It was proven a long time ago.....))))
>> This is what you have to prove.
>> it's more about proving the opposite.
With any window, the spectrum will change.....
What to do? Who's to blame? ;)
What to do? Whose fault is it? ;)
Evil tongues....)))