"Trees don't grow to the sky" - page 63
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
1. absolutely right. Got to that point myself (not without your help) - came up with it. Although... :-)
After all, in a previous post JOO - correctly wrote, that a Martin - danger for DEPs...
I don't know why I was so lucky to get a hold of a broker ... If I didn't know what to do with it, I'd say I was getting rid of it. :-)
2. I poured money into PAMM of Leonid trading the spreads, in hope of a permanent (quarterly) movement of the yield graph to the north-east! And he poured in - at the start!
Good luck to all of us!
Any pamm is dangerous for your money, either with or without martingale.
Better to buy euros on the rise. Same risks, 20 times less commission.
Better to buy the euro on the rise.
It is better to buy before a rise. Even a fool would buy on a rise, especially when the rise is over.
Any PMP is dangerous for your money, with or without a mattingail.
Any pamm is dangerous for your money, whether with or without mattingale.
It's better to buy euros on the rise. The risks are the same, the commissions are 20 times less.
But after all, in theory, if the specialist has also eaten the dog ("if the cook is not lying to us"), then why not use his services...? After all, the euro can fall deeply... Then it would be better to trade metals purely on seasonal basis when confirming the fundamentals.
The task was originally to distribute the dough in the management of professionals (initially - invincible, Expensivebuyer and the like among the first places of the office) while I - matured to start with the cream taken off it. Over 2 years in the end - the cream turned out to be 4 times minus from the start to date... :-)
That's obvious as it is.
And what do you think is the least dangerous pamm? (that's what we're talking about).
In 2 years' time - the cream ended up with 4 times the minus from the start to date... :-)
You mean the concentrated version?
;)
You mean the concentrated version?
;)
The result of all these experiments suggests that calling managers to make long-term investments in their PAMM - doomed to failure in advance....))))
Short-term only......
Long-term profitable trading while no one has stood out of so many PAMMs....)))))
The result of all these experiments suggests that calling managers to make long-term investments is a doomed venture....))))
Only short-term......
Long-term trading so far no one has stood out of so many PAMMs....)))))
It's understandable as it is.
And what do you think is the least dangerous pamm? (that's what we're talking about).
Large number of trades, no signs of outlasting losses