_Market description - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The system is not perfect, it only aspires to an ideal, you have created it that way. You digest the system itself, it's either work at the bank or imagine how you would create it... I don't know how else. And then build your trading strategies. This book may help you understand the system, it's written in English.
The system may be imperfect, but all such systems will be imperfect in some way (the ideal ones are all alike) and there may be no universal coefficient.
I'm not looking for a system, it's time for me to give them away.) I am already overextended on what I am looking for). Farther will try to be more specific.
P.S. And for the book, thanks, let's look through.
The system may not be perfect, but all such systems will not be perfect in different ways (they all look alike), and there can be no universal coefficient again.
I already have a trading system, and it works, and even more than one. I'm not looking for a system, it's time to give them away.) But I'm already overextended on what I'm looking for.) Farther will try to be more specific.
P.S. And for the book, thanks, let's look through.
You completely misunderstood me... LProgrammer turned out to be right, to explain something to someone, you must first understand how your companion thinks... I can't do that at this stage.
Right, LP. Without reference to TF, specific pair and trading system - bullshit. Otherwise you claim that there are bars on a given pair and TF that can be marked as "perfect entry" and "perfect exit". Even if the TS is not a flip, the hell with it.
P.S. And there is something that does not fit. On a data stream that is just slightly different from a martingale, there are points that are significantly different from each other in some way?
And you'd better buy a dual-core, they're several times faster and cooler now. I recommend Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 if you count on a budget variant.
M, you're the only one with questions... Where's the proof, sorry but there isn't any. If you don't have it, it's not bullshit... :)
to Yourmindmy
had a quick look at your book... I think it's a typical rookie scam created for promotional purposes... some kind of grail is being peddled... with a lot of "truths" like the grass is green and the sky is blue, here's an excerpt:
CONFIDENTIAL FOREX TRADING GOLDEN RULES
Success in the FOREX Market is a product of your psychological make-up, discipline and experience.
don t trade with scared money!
never, never think about the money.
THE F/X MARKET IS NOT KIND; IT IS WHERE GREED AND FEAR RULE! WE ARE FU*KING TRADING MONEY! (THINK ABOUT
THAT).
I don't think we need to go any further... what can you expect from a system put together by such a "specialist"?
Are you demanding proof of your nonsense from me? OK, then, here goes.
If you rotate the chart 180 degrees, your inputs will swap with your outputs, and the chart itself, generally speaking, will not change in nature. Now, according to you, the significance of inputs will, on average, be k times less than the significance of outputs.
You may not bother with the turn, and just trade from the right side of the chart to the deep side. If the signals become different, it means that they exploit the time line (asymmetric in time). Hence your asymmetry with the significances.
P.S. This is all nonsense too.
to Yourmindmy
I've had a quick look at your book... I think it's a typical rookie scam, created for publicity purposes... some kind of grail is being peddled... with a lot of "truths" like the grass is green and the sky is blue, here's an excerpt:
I don't think you should go on... what to expect from such a system composed by such a "specialist"?
Nothing for you ;) But I still can't understand why the grass is not green and the sky is not blue in your mind: )
Are you demanding proof of your nonsense from me? OK, then, here goes.
If you rotate the chart 180 degrees, your inputs will swap with your outputs, and the chart itself, generally speaking, will not change in nature. Now, according to you, the significance of the inputs will, on average, be k times less than the significance of the outputs.
M, show me with your finger where I'm asking you to prove your nonsense... I'm asking you to prove a common and accepted 50x50 statement...
180? M, I think you've already figured out what you said here... :) In a 180 pivot, the former entrances will be the exits after the first pivot... And hence - correctly now the importance of those that were before will be less than those that will be later.
Or do you mean to flip vertically ... Then nothing changes...
I didn't see the proof again. Sorry about that.
You've got me confused with someone else about 50x50, LP. I don't understand what 50x50 is at all.
Again about the 180: turn the monitor upside down. It's a reversal of 180.
P.S. I still don't see how you can talk about the significance of inputs/outputs outside the context of the system. Yes, time asymmetric systems do exist, albeit much less frequently than symmetric ones.
You've got me confused with someone else about 50x50, LP. I don't understand what 50x50 is at all.
Again about the 180: turn the monitor upside down. It's a reversal of 180.
Time used to flow in the monitor from left to right and now it's from right to left... Then nothing changes at all. If we reverse time, then inputs will be outputs and the importance of outputs (former inputs) as they are later, will be higher...
I'm confusing you... hmmm... well then name the way you see this correlation. Between some estimate of the importance ( from 0 to 1 ) of the inputs and the same estimate for the outputs.
why the grass isn't green and the sky isn't blue in your mind: )
look at the picture... >> my cigarette's not just a cigarette... ;)