Who wants a strategy? Lots and for free) - page 55
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Where do these gaps outside the optimisation period come from?
They follow the optimisation period...
They follow the period of optimisation...
Isn't the optimization period equal to the whole period. Or maybe it's a sample from this period... And the parameter is the number of samples...
And the quality of strategies has indeed deteriorated, at least visually, the probability of issuing strategies with good characteristics has decreased...
Maybe it's not the quality of the strategies that has deteriorated, but the quality of the tester/optimiser that has improved:)
Maybe it's not the quality of the strategies that has deteriorated, but the quality of the tester/optimiser that has improved:)
Maybe. I was just testing with a certain stop timeframe step, and the result I got in the new version was inferior in some respects to the previous ones, although I expected better result and much better. Although it is not an indicator, of course...
I can't program the indicators from the FSB. I have an idea that there is a problem with averaging. I never thought I would encounter a problem with Oscillator of MACD.
for(int i=0; i<limit; i++)
MacdBuffer1[i]=iMA(NULL,0,FastEMA1,0,MASmooth,BasePrice,i)-iMA(NULL,0,SlowEMA1,0,MASmooth,BasePrice,i);
for(i=0; i<limit; i++)
MacdBuffer2[i]=iMA(NULL,0,FastEMA2,0,MASmooth,BasePrice,i)-iMA(NULL,0,SlowEMA2,0,MASmooth,BasePrice,i);
for(i=0; i<limit; i++)
OscBuffer[i]=MacdBuffer1[i]-MacdBuffer2[i];
This is all the code in principle. However, the data in FSB do not match. Can anyone help decompose the iMA construct or can someone share the codes.
Or maybe the developer Miroslav will clarify the calculation of averaging parameters in his program in more detail.
HELP!!!
Hello,
Oscillator of MACD = MACD1 - MACD2
The MACD in FSB is the same as MACD in MT.
Test first both MACD1 and MACD2 (Use single MACD). It hasn't be any difference. In the other case correct MACD first.
I couldn't resist - I went over it... Please tell me what I'm doing wrong... 3 variants have different results. MACD1(Simple,Close,3-fast,6-slow) - MACD2(Simple,Close,4-fast,10-slow).
You can also see from everything that I can't even subtract 2 indicators programmatically.