News: 5th digit in quotes - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The more digits, the more zeros.
I'm surprised you haven't noticed the contradiction .
Well, yes - competition... And to get ahead of their competitors, DTs are widening the spread...
That's an interesting thought. Fresh... I see your concern for the poor owners of DT
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe for five digit quotes it would be a useful trick:
Either use int digits=MarketInfo("EURUSD",MODE_DIGITS);
it's easier to set stop and takeoff targets multiplied by 10.
and it is in the parameters
You set 1000 points instead of 100 points and don't modify the code!
most systems (written without constants) will work with 5-digit, if you just multiply target parameters by 10.
but if you do something with constants every 10p or 30p, such advisors will die.
This is what is being sought.
at 5 digits, it has become more difficult to enter the market at 0 slipage!
Atomatics will give the dilemmas more requests!
The more digits, the more zeros.
Would the developers please update the MT version so that Print, for example, prints by default according to Points?
No, not 10, of course. You can see that from the volume chart as well. The increase in traffic and testing time is roughly measured by the ratio between the average spread and the average tick value (both in pips).
Personally, I don't feel comfortable catching the right spread... I don't know how it will be at the weekend :(
What a gift this New Year's Eve has brought. :(
вот подарок под новый год то привалил как привалил. :(
A simple thought occurred to me - maybe this is exactly the solution of BC problem with incoming quotes filtering.
They use a given density of interbank relativities to compile a set, and then use this 'discrete'
data with isotropic Gaussian averaging window, we need n+/-!10 additive ... which indirectly confirms the highest
the sampling density of this additive: {1,5,9}
01:44:37;1.29321;
01:44:43;1.29321;
01:44:44;1.29320;
01:44:44;1.29319;
01:44:50;1.29321;
01:44:50;1.29329;
01:44:52;1.29331;
01:44:52;1.29341;
01:44:55;1.29385;
01:44:55;1.29384;
01:44:55;1.29370;
01:44:55;1.29350;
01:44:55;1.29341;
01:44:56;1.29350;
01:44:56;1.29350;
01:44:56;1.29341;
01:44:57;1.29341;
01:44:58;1.29341;
01:45:08;1.29341;
01:45:09;1.29342;
01:45:14;1.29340;
01:45:19;1.29338;