
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Now we edit it for our own reasons. Frequent elections are a negative factor for the economy because of expectations of change.
I see that the most prosperous economies in the world are those where there are no elections at all. People there live richly, unlike the decadent states and Europe.
I see that the most prosperous economies in the world are those where there are no elections at all. People there live richly, unlike the decadent states and Europe.
By your logic, prosperity is linearly related to the frequency of elections?
once a year or once a month?
don't compare all countries, each country is its own oscillating system with its own effective frequency.
I see that the most prosperous economies in the world are those where there are no elections at all. People there live richly, unlike the decadent states and Europe.
I can only think of theocratic saudi arabia, oil based economy, no elections, not much prosperity
There is nowhere as caring about the economy and the people as much as in countries with frequent and transparent elections, but there are always negative factors for the economy where elections are cloudy and rare.
Ukraine is a model of prosperity... )))))))))))
ZS recently we talked to some relatives from Kharkiv, their heating has not been turned on yet, they are freezing (...)
Ukraine is a model of prosperity... )))))))))))
>> Elections are a necessary but not sufficient condition for prosperity; it is only a question of who is to be elected from.
PilotF писал(а) >>
Выборы, пере выборы, - посмотрите док. фильм "Дух времени 2 " там все популярно что, кто и зачем, а главное для кого.
keyword
Elections - Watch the documentary "Zeitgeist 2" it says everything what, who and why and mainly for whom.
Ukraine is a tough nut to crack:
plan A worked (economic killers)
plan B was not needed (jackals)
.......
Georgia is a tougher nut to crack:
plan A worked.
But for insurance purposes they used plan B - they whacked Zhvania and Patarkatsishvili