How to form the input values for the NS correctly. - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
klot, I think he posted the normalisation of the normal MA with StdDev.
It is better to use the speed of the MA, i.e. the first derivative, rather than the MA.
It wasn't about indicators, it was about rationing the price in a given area, where the highs and lows are chosen.
There it was about sampling rationing...
Roughly speaking, I have outlined a plan for my work with the neural network, or rather the things I need to pay attention to when developing it.
1. Preparation of input data. (shifting averages, decorrelation, covariance equalization).
Can you be more specific? Preferably with at least a minimum of detail. Interesting.
3. The issue of retraining the network
Well, it's easy to check, and can be treated by reducing the number of parameters. If it's not cured, we have to resample.
4. Cross-checking
More details please.
7. Possibility to use lightka maps (or Kohonen and Grossberg layers?)
I think it's perfect for pattern search.
8. Committee of networks.
Not the case, they are used in expert systems, it is a bit different here.
9. Recursive networks.
Not worth it yet, IMHO.
klot, I think he posted normalisation of a normal MA with StdDev.
I know you can normalise the price too, just not the way from maximum to minimum...
Can you be more specific? Preferably with at least a minimum of detail. Interesting.
Fig. 4.11 from S. Haykin, the book at the beginning of the topic
Well, it's easy to check, and can be treated by reducing the number of parameters. If it's not cured, we have to resample.
>> figs. 4.18, 4.19 ibid.
More details, please.
Fig. 4.20, 4.21 ibid.
Fig. 4.11 from S. Haykin, book at the beginning of the topical
Figs. 4.18, 4.19 ibid.
Fig. 4.20, 4.21 ibid.
Yep, I'll have something to read tonight, quite possibly breaking out the code soon :)
Will you share?
Of course, otherwise I wouldn't talk about it. Unless, of course, there's something to share.
Usually 3 out of 2 or 5 out of 3 is done. That is, out of 3 nets, 2 must "opt in". Committees are of course better, as 3 not very profitable nets, can give a much higher profit than each individually. But it is necessary to choose nets in committees very deliberately, as not every network with another one will work properly.