
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's the same for me if you call it like this.
True, the dots in both variants do not overlay exactly. But this is most likely a peculiarity of SetArrow()
Here is a picture
True, the points in both variants do not overlay exactly. But this is most likely a feature of SetArrow()
No, this is a feature of the OBJ_ARROW graphical object. It is not anchored by the centre of mass, but by the middle of the upper boundary.
The ArrayMo() function.
Returns Modu - the maximum of the distribution density curve. The function accepts the following optional parameters:
Example of using the ArrayMo() function.
Determines the most frequently occurring High price level among the last 1000 or so bars of the current chart:
SZY. Attached is a script to test the ArrayMo() function.The b-Array function library has been published in full and is designed to work with arrays.
There is another one, calculation of covariance
corrected.
There is another one, calculation of covariance
add it to the library. Although there are much more arrays (matrices) definitions. But I think we will fill it gradually.There are a couple of questions:
1. what is mo_XY?
2. In the line of accumulation of MOs by X
1. mo_XY can be removed, checked different calculation options. This is left over from bad variant.
2. This algorithm that I cited has minimal chances to get error in calculations if Time[] comes in as X. Multiplication of large numbers gradually causes buildup of error and it will appear. Exactly for this purpose, elimination of possible appearance of this error, X is (additionally) shifted to the origin by subtracting X[0]
3. I was overthinking, maybe I'm out of order. The main thing is that the values typed in X correspond to Y
I will correct it now.
This is an unnecessary operation. You can double-check it.
I disagree.
It's a good rule of thumb to distrust. Check it in any maths package. We'll post the results. I'll do it in MathCade right now.