It's an interesting topic. I have an idea, but a simpler one. I'll ask questions for now :)
It's clear how to determine the entry point - we take a zig-zag, but we need to know what was before the point to predict the entry. What window in the bars is used to analyse the preceding data?
Have you tried to separate the input and output functions? Or is a reversal - the arrival of the opposite signal usually used? What would be the result if different ways of profit/loss fixing were used instead of an exit to a flip?
It's an interesting topic. I have an idea, but a simpler one. I'll ask questions for now :)
It's clear how to determine the entry point - we take a zig-zag, but we need to know what was before the point to predict the entry. What window in the bars is used to analyse the preceding data?
Have you tried to separate the input and output functions? Or is the reversal - the arrival of the opposite signal - usually used? What would be the result if different ways of profit/loss fixing were used instead of an exit to a flip?
I tried 1 bar forward forecasting, that is a shift of 1 bar back. But the problem is that the zigzag on the last bars needs to be filled with values and it is overdrawn, so everything is not so clear... I'm still using reversal signals to open/reopen, or I'm screwing with martin... But the field of research is very large, it's hard to say how to do it right...
So far, nothing interesting is coming out. There may be errors in the code and logic. I'm writing just to develop the topic, so to speak, maybe someone will change it for himself or correct my mistakes.
I've fixed the main moments in code. Prognosis bars - prediction depth, how many bars to look forward. Then length of array for grid training and number of training epochs. 30 neurons, you can change it in the code.
Gentlemen, if your Expert Advisors do not take the fundamentals into account, then the probability of profit/loss = 50/50 - spread! And no neurons in the Expert Advisor will help, neither their own nor anyone else's:)
Rustam Karpunin: Gentlemen, if your Expert Advisors do not take into account the foundation, then the probability of profit/loss = 50/50 - the spread! And no neurons in the Expert Advisor will help, neither their own nor anyone else's:)
Rustam Karpunin: Gentlemen, if your Expert Advisors don't learn the fundamentals, the probability of profit/loss = 50/50 - spread! And no neurons in the Expert Advisor will help, neither their own nor anyone else's:)
This is very cool, I've started to buy some features of working with them, I've already got interesting results, I'll post them later. I just need to spend a lot of time to think out a strategy.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
It's an interesting topic. I have an idea, but a simpler one. I'll ask questions for now :)
It's clear how to determine the entry point - we take a zig-zag, but we need to know what was before the point to predict the entry. What window in the bars is used to analyse the preceding data?
Have you tried to separate the input and output functions? Or is a reversal - the arrival of the opposite signal usually used? What would be the result if different ways of profit/loss fixing were used instead of an exit to a flip?
It's an interesting topic. I have an idea, but a simpler one. I'll ask questions for now :)
It's clear how to determine the entry point - we take a zig-zag, but we need to know what was before the point to predict the entry. What window in the bars is used to analyse the preceding data?
Have you tried to separate the input and output functions? Or is the reversal - the arrival of the opposite signal - usually used? What would be the result if different ways of profit/loss fixing were used instead of an exit to a flip?
Started up the neuroner in the demo yesterday https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/129790 Seems to be ok so far.
Прикольно, понаблюдаемс.. а что в основу заложено?
So far, nothing interesting is coming out. There may be errors in the code and logic. I'm writing just to develop the topic, so to speak, maybe someone will change it for himself or correct my mistakes.
I've fixed the main moments in code. Prognosis bars - prediction depth, how many bars to look forward. Then length of array for grid training and number of training epochs. 30 neurons, you can change it in the code.
Gentlemen, if your Expert Advisors do not take into account the foundation, then the probability of profit/loss = 50/50 - the spread! And no neurons in the Expert Advisor will help, neither their own nor anyone else's:)
Gentlemen, if your Expert Advisors don't learn the fundamentals, the probability of profit/loss = 50/50 - spread! And no neurons in the Expert Advisor will help, neither their own nor anyone else's:)