Strategy tester. - page 2

New comment
 
I did :)
Now I get a message
There were 1 passes done during optimization
 
There were 1 passes done during optimization

This means that the variable parameters for the optimization are not specified (or they are not set correctly).
Please enter correct values for Start, Step and Stop in Inputs.
 
Gentlemen, so that you don't have any doubts, do a few things. <br / translate="no"> 1. after the generation of a sequence (just wait until the stop button becomes active), open the corresponding file offline - it is marked in the list by a blue icon with the letter G. And set the display to Japanese candlesticks. this will very clearly inform you about the bar development
2. insert output TOHLCV to the beginning of the Expert Advisor in the file for more accurate analysis.
3. output the results of checking for entry and exit signals, at least in the log.
4. when deinitializing the EA, print the entire history and look at commissions, swaps, and profits.
And then make a complaint.


Bravo. '-)
 
Bravo. '-)

You might not get into the system the first time. The tester is really good and accurate.
In the coming days we will post some articles revealing the ideology and features of the strategy tester.
Just wait a bit.
 
Yesterday I tried a tester with optimisation on a standard Moving Avarage - I tested the days on USDCHF.

I ran EMA from 24 to 60, I think - 21 runs in total with "All ticks" (about 40 and something million ticks with 35% quality of generation). The optimization worked for less than 40 min and showed 3 profits from 20 to 36%, which is not bad for this EA ;) In general, it works ;)

Note on the tester, i.e. presentation of optimization results - when I click on a result I am taken to "Settings" page, I have to guess to click on "Expert Advisor Properties" to see the parameters of the given optimization result. I think it would be more correct in this case to go to "Settings" tab and immediately display a table with "Properties of Expert" for this optimization run to see what parameters this run has.
 
<br / translate="no"> You may not get into the system the first time.

Yeah :)
Found out what's wrong.
By default the start parameter (for me personally) was larger than the current one, so I set the end parameter small and the pitch positive. This was the error. However, when I set the step to negative, optimization got underway, but the parameters didn't change, i.e. the Expert Advisor was always called with the same parameters. Only by setting a small initial value, a larger final value and a positive step was it possible to make it work.
 
Remarks on the tester, more precisely on the presentation of optimization results - when I click on a result in the optimization, I am taken to "Settings" page, I should guess to click after that on "Expert Properties" to see what parameters this optimization result has. I think it would be more correct in this case to go to "Settings" tab and immediately display a table with "Properties of Expert" for this optimization run to see what parameters this run has.


I didn't understand it at first either. In the tab, the results of the optimization. you just need to put the cursor on the result of interest to you.
You will see the optimization parameters.
 
What will the developers answer to my post of 02.07.05 08:50?

In a nutshell - I took Expert Advisor from distribution kit and ran it on days with full simulation.

The result turned out to be nonsensical(Grail).
(See that post)
23 2004.04.08:45 sell 12 1.00 1.2757 0.0000 1.2727 24 2004.04.08:46 t/p 12 1.00 1.2727 0.0000 1.2727 235.76 12757.20 25 2004.04.08:46 sell 13 1.00 1.2757 0.0000 1.2727 26 2004.04.08:47 t/p 13 1.00 1.2727 0.0000 1.2727 235.76 12992.96 27 2004.04.08:47 sell 14 1.00 1.2757 0.0000 1.2727 28 2004.04.08:48 t/p 14 1.00 1.2727 0.0000 1.2727 235.76 13228.72


I don't want to go into all this in detail.
It's enough for me that even at first glance in trivial situations you get the wrong result.

 
It doesn't seem to be counting right. That can't be right. Currency EURUSD.
.................................... 225 2005.04.15 16:29 buy 113 1.00 1.2920 1.2847 1.2925 226 2005.04.15 16:30 t/p 113 1.00 1.2925 1.2847 1.2925 31.25 12360.00 .................................... 259 2005.05.06 14:45 sell 130 1.00 1.2862 1.2935 1.2857 260 2005.05.06 15:01 t/p 130 1.00 1.2857 1.2935 1.2857 50.00 12406.25 261 2005.06.02 08:57 buy 131 1.00 1.2248 1.2175 1.2253 262 2005.06.02 09:14 t/p 131 1.00 1.2253 1.2175 1.2253 -51.25 12355.00 263 2005.06.02 09:27 buy 132 1.00 1.2263 1.2190 1.2268 264 2005.06.02 09:52 t/p 132 1.00 1.2268 1.2190 1.2268 50.00 12405.00 .................................... 291 2005.06.29 17:08 buy 146 1.00 1.2087 1.2014 1.2092 292 2005.06.29 17:43 t/p 146 1.00 1.2092 1.2014 1.2092 8.75 12273.25
 
I don't want to go into all this in detail.

Then why are you writing? You know very well what the answer to claims like "crooked and so on" is.
Provide exact and detailed questions, please.
123456789...11
New comment
Reason: