F - page 15

 
avtomat:

And yet you're wrong, it's not the same, but never mind, I won't change your mind.

(sighs)

I don't understand what this link is about, "how to write an indicator in MQL5" ?

No, I'm not mistaken - there are several mcdacs with different parameters. More precisely - three mcdas, each of which is the difference of itself on different bars, multiplied by a coefficient.

ss

Robot rebellion :)) The forum has a life of its own - it embeds links in the text itself.

 
Perhaps an ACS specialist could help us draw up a MACDa schematic diagram ...
 
avtomat:
Maybe an ACS specialist can help us draw up a MACDa schematic diagram ...?
Do we have to? I understand your calculations (the ones from before ... I don't know what's going on now), but making schemes is like there's nothing else to do :)
 
artmedia70:
Do I have to? I understand your calculations (the ones from before ... I don't know what they are now), but making diagrams is like there's nothing else to do :)
It's not difficult at all.
 
avtomat:
It's not difficult at all.
... and you don't have to...
 
artmedia70:
... and not at all necessary ...
disagree.
 
avtomat:
disagree.
Dig ;)
 
artmedia70:

Wow. It's funny that such an original idea comes down to a simple MACD).

Progressing from a more complex and inefficient tractor to a simpler and no less efficient MACD.

Soon everything will progress to a simple MACD. )

 
Edic:

Wow. It's funny that such an original idea comes down to a simple MACD).

Progressing from a more complex and inefficient tractor to a simpler and no less efficient MACD.

Soon everything will progress to a simple MACD. )

A MACD is two Machs...)
 
Tapochun:
Macd is two maschkas...)
... ...and another signal one. Tests have shown that 2 is no better than one. But why make more if the result is the same.
Reason: