Interesting topic for many: what's new in MetaTrader 4 and MQL4 - big changes on the way - page 61

 
Avals:

what constructive action MQ owes to crenfx?))

What is there to be outraged about? You don't like it, don't use it.

What do you mean, "People don't like it"?)
 
Mischek:

It has nothing to do with men, intelligence, knowledge ...

Rule number ONE, you must ALWAYS respect other people's business, and the rest later

Which side do you read from - hrenfx -> Renat or Renat -> hrenf?
 
TheXpert:
So you don't have to respect your users?
So it turns out... TheXpert, I think we're arguing with a "plant"...
 
JJerboa:
What do you mean, Peeple eats?
If the service is unsatisfactory, I change supplier. Voting with your feet) revolutions and self-affirmation are out.
 

Avals:

If the service is unsatisfactory, I change supplier. (foot-voting) revolutions and self-affirmation are out.


Oh, I mean, "Normal heroes always go the other way."

...

or is it "bypassed" again?

 
TheXpert:
So you don't have to respect your users?

There are fundamentals which, if adhered to, will not cause chaos and something will work and develop. They include the rule of respect for other people's business, inviolability of other people's property, etc.

The attitude towards the user, the consumer is the decision of the producer of the service or product. He has the right not to respect (in the sense that we are now discussing), but the market will quickly correct him or throw him the fuck out.

 
Silent:
Which side should I read - hrenfx -> Renat or Renat -> hrenf?
In this case hrenfx is a service user, Renat is a service provider
 
JJerboa:

Oh, I mean, "Normal heroes always go the other way!"

...

Or is it "bypassing" again?

You want to make money or become a hero?)
 
Avals:
You want to make money or become a hero?)
That's cruel Glory, he won't be able to choose )
 
If someone chooses to shit and does not realise it, they are at fault.
Reason: