Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2106
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Where to?
You know, not to minimize RMSE or whatever, but to put your fitness fund there.
How do you do that?
I'm just making a prediction of the model 500 points ahead
4 sine waves (model) to predict very simply, in fact a linear prediction
I deleted it, I thought no one is interested, I can send you the code, but you need to translate it into a readable form
By the way, I faced the instability of the annealing method, I don't even know how to work with it, very unstable results, parameters jump a lot...
I've come to the following way
First I randomly initialize the starting point,
then when some solution is found I save it
Then I do it again, but with the starting parameters of the solution I've found, and so on...
Please drop me a line.
The annealing is unstable. Use rgenout. Tested, reliable.
Models apply loss function. Write your own and if the model allows you to insert your loss function, try it.
I just make a prediction of the obtained model for 500 points in advance
but I think to trade only the first 1-2 deals
and need to learn how to find quality parameters
It is possible to use two differently directed models.
I tried to learn it separately by my basic strategy - the results were worse, I think it's because of unbalanced sampling - too many zeros are obtained and training is based on them.
I want to try another version - to teach the direction using a separate model. It will turn out that the first model is trained on volatility, and the second on its vector. But again, the sample size should be large.
I tried to teach my basic strategy separately - the results were worse, I think due to unbalanced sampling - too many zeros are obtained and training is based on them.
I want to try another option - to teach the direction with a separate model. It will turn out that the first model is trained on volatility, and the second on its vector. But again, the sample size should be large.
For unbalanced classes you can use oversampling. I've tried both 2 and 3 models, there's essentially no difference.
I.e. duplicate rows with target "1"? Tried it - my result hardly changed at all on CatBoost. Probably need to add some noise.
I.e. duplicate lines with target "1"? I tried it - my result hardly changed at all on CatBoost. Maybe I need to add some noise.
I.e. duplicate lines with target "1"? I tried it - my result hardly changed at all on CatBoost. Maybe I need to add some noise.
Do not duplicate. Googling oversampling, such as SMOTE. I also do not learn when the imbalance is large. After oversampling it's fine.
Well yes, essentially adding noise to the predictor metrics. This could affect the quantization bounds by increasing the selection of areas with ones, but by idea the same effect should be when adding duplicates, the only thing I assume is that duplicates are cut by the CatBoost algorithm before starting training (need to verify), then yes - an option.