Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 3089
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So any of us can create a decent code better than the abandoned Darcha with bugs if we work hard on it.
And in other languages, does everyone work their projects to death?
What's the complaint, and to whom? And what does R have to do with it?
Does everyone on other JA's run their projects to death?
What is the complaint, and to whom? And what does R have to do with it?
Again, to which this was a reply.
Blind faith NOT in packages, but in a professional development environment.
....All of the above is what defines R as a professional development environment and an environment for statistical professionals.
.....
NO sane programmer would NOT entrust money to a homemade programme? If you have an ingenious optimisation algorithm, that formalise the package and put it on CRAN. But the distance from what you have to CRAN is huge. It takes a huge effort to turn your homemade algorithms into a professional and generally available tool. By the way, optimisation algorithms in R are only a shell in R, and the algorithm itself is either C++ or Fortran.
Don't idealise R and packages in it. I have shown an example that there are packages with bugs in it too. They didn't want to fix them and just deleted them.
The same "kolkhoz" is present there, as we are called here..... But what does collective labour have to do with it? - Collective labour can be more significant and cleaned from errors (10 people work on katbust for a good salary all the time). Rather and in R there are self-designs/drafts of single developers (taking into account what Renat said - they mostly work with individuals). And here mostly everyone works independently.
I'll repeat what this was in response to
Don't idealise R and the packages in it. I showed an example that there are packages with bugs in it too. Which they didn't want to fix, but just removed.
The same "kolkhoz" is present there, as we are called here..... But what does collective labour have to do with it? - Collective labour can be more significant and cleaned from errors (10 people work on katbust for a good salary all the time). Rather and in R there are self-designs/drafts of single developers (taking into account what Renat said - they mostly work with individuals). And here it's mostly everyone working on their own.
I once asked you how you know if a vehicle has been retrained.
here you go https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pbo/index.html
https://github.com/mrbcuda/pbo
No one is idealising, we just sometimes respond to the attacks of the stoners with their own language.
What's the idea? Do they compare statistical parameters at the training and test sites? And if worse by 2, 3, 5, 10 times, then retrained?
I haven't sorted it out myself yet, just caught my eye, don't have time for everything catastrophically