But sorry, I'm confused, then in what kind of case they should be different?
Absolute
Drawdown: Drawdown from the initial account balance; how much the balance has decreased in relation to the initial deposit
Maximal
Drawdown: The largest drop from a peak to a trough during a certain time period (expressed as a monetary value). It may be higher than
the "Absolute Drawdown" and show a loss even during a profit-earning period.
Relative
Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial deposit
Absolute Drawdown: Drawdown from the initial account balance; how much the balance has
decreased in relation to the initial deposit
Maximal Drawdown: The largest drop from a peak to a trough during a certain time period
(expressed as a monetary value). It may be higher than the "Absolute Drawdown" and show a loss even during a profit-earning period.
Relative Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial
deposit
>> Relative Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial deposit.
What is the meaning of the value for Relative Drawdown? In Test 2 displayed below, my deposit is 3,000, the Relative
Drawdown is 28.98% and its value is 156,975.16.
If Relative Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial deposit, the value of Relative
Drawdown must smaller than initial deposit.
But in my test, Relative Drawdown is always higher than my initial deposit.
Absolute Drawdown: Drawdown from the initial account balance; how much the balance has
decreased in relation to the initial deposit
Maximal Drawdown: The largest drop from a peak to a trough during a certain time period
(expressed as a monetary value). It may be higher than the "Absolute Drawdown" and show a loss even during a profit-earning period.
Relative Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial
deposit
To make it short, all kind of drawdowns are important in a backtest, I look at the highest and make sure that isn't above my expectations and
projections.
To make it short, all kind of drawdowns are important in a backtest, I look at the highest and make sure that isn't above my expectations
and projections.
Thank you, Eleni.
Exactly, all kind of drawdowns are important in a backtest.
>> Relative Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial deposit.
What is the meaning of the value for Relative Drawdown? In Test 2 displayed below, my deposit is 3,000, the Relative
Drawdown is 28.98% and its value is 156,975.16.
If Relative Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial deposit, the value of
Relative Drawdown must smaller than initial deposit.
But in my test, Relative Drawdown is always higher than my initial deposit.
Test 2
Well, the initial deposit isn't the initial balance - your balance grows.
That one for example, has reached 29%dd when your balance was approx 542000 : 29%*542000 = 157000
To make it short, all kind of drawdowns are important in a backtest, I look at the highest and make sure that isn't above my expectations
and projections.
yes that way ... more than 30% is worrying :/ risky first, but above all it testifies of a fail of the ea's exit algo
I'm not a English native, so I always misunderstand something.
What do you mean "above all it testifies of a fail of the ea's exit algo"?
Is that mean if the DD is more than 30%, it should be risky and we have to make sure the algo again?
The lowest the dd the better it is - for sure you understood that.
30% is good but that drawdown if it hits the stop becomes a loss <-> for 1 000 000$, 30% is 300 000$ - it's not nothing - so one may wish to
reduce the drawdown even more.
So if you're looking a lower drawdown (10-20%) while it's reaching 30% on your board then it may be a fail of the exit strategy : a stoploss
missing due to lag, vps disconnection, or gaps between session
In that case you expect 10-20% of drawdown, and consider 30% for the unexpected... you understand ? Because even the smallest mistake in
the algo can appear to be finally very expensive !
The lowest the dd the better it is - for sure you understood that.
30% is good but that drawdown if it hits the stop becomes a loss <-> for 1 000 000$, 30% is 300 000$ - it's not nothing - so one may
wish to reduce the drawdown even more.
So if you're looking a lower drawdown (10-20%) while it's reaching 30% on your board then it may be a fail of the exit strategy : a
stoploss missing due to lag, vps disconnection, or gaps between session
In that case you expect 10-20% of drawdown, and consider 30% for the unexpected... you understand ? Because even the smallest
mistake in the algo can appear to be finally very expensive !
* Any applicable local taxes will automatically be applied at check-out. Please note that subscriptions can be cancelled at any time, however additional fees will apply to resume at a later date. Once your subscription expires, you will no longer be eligible for further software updates and premium support services. NOTE: Tickstory provides...
Thank you, Eleni.
But sorry, I'm confused, then in what kind of case they should be different?
Thank you so much, Icham.
>> Relative Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial deposit.
What is the meaning of the value for Relative Drawdown? In Test 2 displayed below, my deposit is 3,000, the Relative Drawdown is 28.98% and its value is 156,975.16.
If Relative Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial deposit, the value of Relative Drawdown must smaller than initial deposit.
But in my test, Relative Drawdown is always higher than my initial deposit.
Test 2
To make it short, all kind of drawdowns are important in a backtest, I look at the highest and make sure that isn't above my expectations and projections.
To make it short, all kind of drawdowns are important in a backtest, I look at the highest and make sure that isn't above my expectations and projections.
Thank you, Eleni.
Exactly, all kind of drawdowns are important in a backtest.
Thank you so much, Icham.
>> Relative Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial deposit.
What is the meaning of the value for Relative Drawdown? In Test 2 displayed below, my deposit is 3,000, the Relative Drawdown is 28.98% and its value is 156,975.16.
If Relative Drawdown: Shows the "Maximum Drawdown" expressed as a percentage of initial deposit, the value of Relative Drawdown must smaller than initial deposit.
But in my test, Relative Drawdown is always higher than my initial deposit.
Test 2
Well, the initial deposit isn't the initial balance - your balance grows.
That one for example, has reached 29%dd when your balance was approx 542000 : 29%*542000 = 157000
To make it short, all kind of drawdowns are important in a backtest, I look at the highest and make sure that isn't above my expectations and projections.
yes that way ... more than 30% is worrying :/ risky first, but above all it testifies of a fail of the ea's exit algo
yes that way ... more than 30% is worrying :/ risky first, but above all it testifies of a fail of the ea's exit algo
Thank you for your continuing support, Icham.
I'm not a English native, so I always misunderstand something.
What do you mean "above all it testifies of a fail of the ea's exit algo"?
Is that mean if the DD is more than 30%, it should be risky and we have to make sure the algo again?
Thank you for your continuing support, Icham.
I'm not a English native, so I always misunderstand something.
What do you mean "above all it testifies of a fail of the ea's exit algo"?
Is that mean if the DD is more than 30%, it should be risky and we have to make sure the algo again?
The lowest the dd the better it is - for sure you understood that.
30% is good but that drawdown if it hits the stop becomes a loss <-> for 1 000 000$, 30% is 300 000$ - it's not nothing - so one may wish to reduce the drawdown even more.
So if you're looking a lower drawdown (10-20%) while it's reaching 30% on your board then it may be a fail of the exit strategy : a stoploss missing due to lag, vps disconnection, or gaps between session
The lowest the dd the better it is - for sure you understood that.
30% is good but that drawdown if it hits the stop becomes a loss <-> for 1 000 000$, 30% is 300 000$ - it's not nothing - so one may wish to reduce the drawdown even more.
So if you're looking a lower drawdown (10-20%) while it's reaching 30% on your board then it may be a fail of the exit strategy : a stoploss missing due to lag, vps disconnection, or gaps between session
Thank you, Icham. I got it.
Where do you get high quality test data?
Thank you, Icham. I got it.
Where do you get high quality test data?
As I remember, there's a soft called tickstory for MT4.
And for MT5, brokers' data are often of good quality.