Indicators: Perfect Trend Line 2 - page 4

New comment
 
Mladen please I beg you to please revisit this great indicator and add alerts please.. I beg you 🙏🙏🙏🙏
 

It seems Mladen never com back online or check his code. I failed hundreds of times trying to add alert function into his original code, that could be the reason he didn't make that. So I have created an add-on indicator just for this alert function with PTL. 

If anyone want it, feel free to send friend request and text me.

 
Sopheak Khlot #:

It seems Mladen never com back online or check his code. I failed hundreds of times trying to add alert function into his original code, that could be the reason he didn't make that. So I have created an add-on indicator just for this alert function with PTL. 

If anyone want it, feel free to send friend request and text me.

Let me see : because you have failed "hundreds of times" (and all that after "more than 5 years of MQL programing") to make it alert, it means that I could not make it either?

What else can I say but : 😀😀😀😀😀

Good luck with that "logic" when it comes to coding (and an obvious commercial spamming)

 
Mladen Rakic #:

Let me see : because you have failed "hundreds of times" (and all that after "more than 5 years of MQL programing") to make it alert, it means that I could not make it either?

What else can I say but : 😀😀😀😀😀

Good luck with that "logic" when it comes to coding (and an obvious commercial spamming)

I seem to wake you up, sorry for that. but with my few years coding is experiences, adding alert directly in your code is harder than i would thinks. But when I code an add-on it seem to work fine. I used iCustom to get your candleo[], candlec[] and arrowar[] , and from that I got it right.

 
Sopheak Khlot #:

I seem to wake you up, sorry for that. but with my few years coding is experiences, adding alert directly in your code is harder than i would thinks. But when I code an add-on it seem to work fine. I used iCustom to get your candleo[], candlec[] and arrowar[] , and from that I got it right.

Pathetic ...

 
Mladen Rakic #:

Pathetic ...

I have to agree. The comments in this thread border on absurd.

A basic Print() test added below line 148 shows dot values:

if(arrowar[i] != EMPTY_VALUE) Print("arrowar: ", arrowar[i]);
 
Mladen Rakic #:

Pathetic ...

Arrogant
 
Gerard William G J B M Dinh Sy #:
Arrogant

Ah, the famous "coder" that first flooded the code base with "indicators" that all had the same error, and all of them now (after "being insulted" by the fact that he was shown the mistake he was doing in all of his "code") do nothing?

Thank you for your kind attention. /s

 
Mladen Rakic #:
Ah, the famous "coder" that first flooded the code base with "indicators" that all had the same error, and all of them now (after "being insulted" by the fact that he was shown the mistake he was doing in all of his "code") do nothing?

It reminds me of a work wanted ad that I saw in a newspaper... "Master Carpenter needs work. Have hammer. Will travel."

 
Mladen Rakic #:

Ah, the famous "coder" that first flooded the code base with "indicators" that all had the same error, and all of them now (after "being insulted" by the fact that he was shown the mistake he was doing in all of his "code") do nothing?

Thank you for your kind attention. /s

I had responded to the offense, but I was moderate. 

You can publish what you want, not me. 

I haven't changed my mind. 
Your codes are not better, or even they don't work. 

I have to say thank you, sharing was a waste of time. 
I prefer to stay focused on my goals
12345
New comment