Download MetaTrader 5

A good mathematician should be good in forex.

To add comments, please log in or register
Imtiaz Ahmed
7480
Imtiaz Ahmed  
  • 53%
    (47)
  • 47%
    (42)
Total voters: 89
Dua Yong Rew
5455
Dua Yong Rew  
I would say more likely but not definitely
okwh
1637
okwh  
gbemi1 AJAYI
856
gbemi1 AJAYI  
this is also false
Ronnie Mansolillo
5583
Ronnie Mansolillo  
why should be good? math is the only factor that move prices or does price move on math calculations?
Robert Mihali
6261
Robert Mihali  

I don't agree at all with this statement. I'm studying math and I don't think that to be good in trading implies immediately that you are good in math. 

Math is much more than finance 

Simon Gniadkowski
Moderator
18023
Simon Gniadkowski  
Did you mean "needs to be" ?  and at what level ?  do you mean 2nd order differential equations ?  or be able to calculate a percentage ?
Tonny Obare
35122
Tonny Obare  
False.
Rinor Memeti
2735
Rinor Memeti  

Why that? For calculating i have my computer :D

Erdem Sen
1736
Erdem Sen  

no one needs advanced mathematics here, intermediate statistics at most!

it is a stupid idea (sorry), I had made many researches for my ms thesis about financial data, gone deep (hilbert spaces, fourier and wavelet transforms..., difusion, stochastic differential equations... and even (dont lough) relativistic aproaches). Result is redicilous, it is a lie, a big LIE, only true for unrealistic scientists.

They publish articles on mathematical finance, look at them. Only few tells the truth about this dream (like Engle). Many tells about only theories which relies on failed axioms (simple examples: normality, continiuty). All of them results useless methods which only satisfies dreamers.

I wander about the "true" votes, tell us why? mathematically? or cut the b.s.

Alain Verleyen
Moderator
32004
Alain Verleyen  
erdogenes:

no one needs advanced mathematics here, intermediate statistics at most!

it is a stupid idea (sorry), I had made many researches for my ms thesis about financial data, gone deep (hilbert spaces, fourier and wavelet transforms..., difusion, stochastic differential equations... and even (dont lough) relativistic aproaches). Result is redicilous, it is a lie, a big LIE, only true for unrealistic scientists.

They publish articles on mathematical finance, look at them. Only few tells the truth about this dream (like Engle). Many tells about only theories which relies on failed axioms (simple examples: normality, continiuty). All of them results useless methods which only satisfies dreamers.

I wander about the "true" votes, tell us why? mathematically? or cut the b.s.

It's very interesting. Is your thesis available publicly ?

It would be a good idea for you to publish an article on this site.

1234
To add comments, please log in or register