Download MetaTrader 5
To add comments, please log in or register
How to launch your trading signal and become a provider
Imtiaz Ahmed
6455
Imtiaz Ahmed 2014.02.05 03:05 
  • 53%
    (47)
  • 47%
    (42)
Total voters: 89
Dua Yong Rew
5207
Dua Yong Rew 2014.02.05 04:15  
I would say more likely but not definitely
okwh
1630
okwh 2014.02.05 07:20  
gbemi1 AJAYI
831
gbemi1 AJAYI 2014.02.05 08:51  
this is also false
Ronnie Mansolillo
4922
Ronnie Mansolillo 2014.02.05 09:46  
why should be good? math is the only factor that move prices or does price move on math calculations?
Robert Mihali
5960
Robert Mihali 2014.02.05 09:56  

I don't agree at all with this statement. I'm studying math and I don't think that to be good in trading implies immediately that you are good in math. 

Math is much more than finance 

Simon Gniadkowski
Moderator
17975
Simon Gniadkowski 2014.02.05 10:23  
Did you mean "needs to be" ?  and at what level ?  do you mean 2nd order differential equations ?  or be able to calculate a percentage ?
Tonny Obare
24378
Tonny Obare 2014.02.05 10:45  
False.
Rinor Memeti
2656
Rinor Memeti 2014.03.06 14:31  

Why that? For calculating i have my computer :D

Erdem Sen
1672
Erdem Sen 2014.03.06 15:44  

no one needs advanced mathematics here, intermediate statistics at most!

it is a stupid idea (sorry), I had made many researches for my ms thesis about financial data, gone deep (hilbert spaces, fourier and wavelet transforms..., difusion, stochastic differential equations... and even (dont lough) relativistic aproaches). Result is redicilous, it is a lie, a big LIE, only true for unrealistic scientists.

They publish articles on mathematical finance, look at them. Only few tells the truth about this dream (like Engle). Many tells about only theories which relies on failed axioms (simple examples: normality, continiuty). All of them results useless methods which only satisfies dreamers.

I wander about the "true" votes, tell us why? mathematically? or cut the b.s.

Alain Verleyen
Moderator
29592
Alain Verleyen 2014.03.06 17:46  
erdogenes:

no one needs advanced mathematics here, intermediate statistics at most!

it is a stupid idea (sorry), I had made many researches for my ms thesis about financial data, gone deep (hilbert spaces, fourier and wavelet transforms..., difusion, stochastic differential equations... and even (dont lough) relativistic aproaches). Result is redicilous, it is a lie, a big LIE, only true for unrealistic scientists.

They publish articles on mathematical finance, look at them. Only few tells the truth about this dream (like Engle). Many tells about only theories which relies on failed axioms (simple examples: normality, continiuty). All of them results useless methods which only satisfies dreamers.

I wander about the "true" votes, tell us why? mathematically? or cut the b.s.

It's very interesting. Is your thesis available publicly ?

It would be a good idea for you to publish an article on this site.

/ /1234
To add comments, please log in or register